News

News

Latest Articles

Search results: 1707 articles

Swedish fast food companies release carbon footprint data for their products

Swedish fast-food chain Max Burger has published its carbon footprint, claiming to be the world's first to do so. The carbon footprint of beef products is relatively high compared to other foods. The carbon footprint of a meat product is calculated by adding up the greenhouse gas emissions from the methane emitted by the cattle, the machinery used on the farm, and the transportation of the cattle, including trucks. This fast-food chain took a different approach, advocating for "less meat" and launching "less-meat products." The company aimed for transparency with consumers and hoped other fast-food businesses would follow suit. Max Burger unexpectedly gained significant brand exposure by disclosing its carbon footprint, without any negative impact. A recent survey in Sweden showed that 92% of consumers wanted to know more about a product's "green credentials" when purchasing it. Climate Label vs. Carbon Label: Due to the complexity and expense of carbon footprint calculation, two Swedish food manufacturers are currently developing a simpler and more easily understood label to replace the abstract meaning of carbon footprint. The label under development is called the Climate Label, which is used in agriculture...

Chemical Footprint of COP15

The Carbon Footprint of COP15: December nights in Denmark are bitterly cold, and winter isn't peak tourist season. However, nearly 20,000 people from around the world flocked to this Nordic country with a population of just over 5 million in recent days. They (including BBC Chinese reporters) were there to attend the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP15) held in Copenhagen from December 7th to 18th. The main purpose of the conference was to discuss how to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, but the fact that tens of thousands of people came from all corners of the world raised questions about whether the conference itself was environmentally friendly. Former US Vice President Al Gore launched Live Earth, a global concert tour aimed at promoting environmental protection, in 2007. While receiving applause, it also faced considerable criticism. At the time, many environmentalists pointed out that the large number of singers traveling the world by plane for performances already generated a significant amount of carbon dioxide, the so-called "carbon footprint." A 40,000-ton carbon footprint: Perhaps learning from past experiences, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has placed particular emphasis on reducing the "carbon footprint" of the Copenhagen climate conference. The UNFCCC initially estimates that the climate conference, lasting less than two weeks, will generate more than 40,000 tons of carbon dioxide. These greenhouse gas emissions mainly come from two sources: transportation used by participants to and from the conference.

The U.S. CPSIA reiterates its regulations regarding lead content in textiles

The US CPSIA reiterates its regulations on lead content in textiles. Based on the "Statement of Policy: Testing and Certification of Lead Content in Children’s Products" published by the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) in October 2009, the CPSC considers the probability of certain textile raw materials containing more than 300 ppm of lead to be extremely low, therefore exempting them from related testing and certification requirements. Excluded products include: 1. Textiles: including all dyed and undyed natural and synthetic fibers, but excluding textiles with post-processing applications such as dyeing, transfer printing, and printing. 2. Four-color printing (CMYK): dyes such as cyan, magenta, yellow, and black. 3. Raw materials derived from plants and animals: such as feathers and untreated leather. Example: Material | Testing Required | Reason/Limit Unprinted dyed fabric | No | Unprinted textiles are determined to have a very low probability of containing more than 300 ppm of lead, therefore testing is not required. Zippers – Textiles (such as zipper tape) No Zippers – Plastic, metal, and painted components Yes Lead content: 300 ppm Pigment lead content: 90

China has released the "Requirements for Pollution Control Labeling of Electronic Information Products".

China released the "Requirements for Pollution Control Labeling of Electronic Information Products" on November 17, 2009. The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology officially released SJ/Z 11388-2009, "General Rules for the Environmentally Friendly Use Period of Electronic Information Products." This standard is a guiding technical document, used in conjunction with the "Requirements for Pollution Control Labeling of Electronic Information Products" (SJ/T 11364-2006). It mainly stipulates the general rules for determining the environmentally friendly use period of electronic information products containing hazardous substances. It can effectively guide enterprises to determine the environmentally friendly use period of their products more scientifically and rationally. Laws and Regulations | Supporting Standards | Implementation Date * **Administrative Measures for Pollution Control of Electronic Information Products (No. 39)** [Promulgated on February 28, 2006; officially effective March 1, 2007] * **Limits of Hazardous Substances in Electronic Information Products (SJ-T 11363-2006)** November 6, 2006 * **Detection Methods for Hazardous Substances in Electronic Information Products (SJ-T 11365-2006)** * **Pollution Control Labeling Requirements for Electronic Information Products (SJ-T 11364-2006)** * **General Rules for the Use of Electronic Information Products within the Environmental Protection Period (SJ/Z 11388-2009)** January 1, 2010 – References

Frequently Asked Questions about China's "General Rules for the Environmentally Friendly Use Period of Electronic Information Products"

Frequently Asked Questions about the General Rules for Environmentally Friendly Use Period of Electronic Information Products in China To help manufacturers of electronic information products determine the environmentally friendly use period of their products, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology recently issued the General Rules for Environmentally Friendly Use Period of Electronic Information Products. Experts have provided answers to common questions regarding these rules as follows: I. Question: Does the General Rules for Environmentally Friendly Use Period serve as a basis for determining the accuracy of an enterprise's labeling of the environmentally friendly use period? Answer: The purpose of the General Rules for Environmentally Friendly Use Period is to help enterprises determine the environmentally friendly use period of their products and further improve the labeling of pollution control for electronic information products. The General Rules for Environmentally Friendly Use Period is an industry-guided technical document and does not itself serve as a basis for determining the accuracy of an enterprise's labeling of the environmentally friendly use period. However, if the environmentally friendly use period determined and labeled on the corresponding product according to the General Rules for Environmentally Friendly Use Period or other methods exceeds the actual environmentally friendly use period of the product, the producer or importer will bear corresponding legal responsibility. II. Question: Does the General Rules for Environmentally Friendly Use Period apply to products that do not contain toxic or hazardous substances or elements? A: The "General Rules for Environmentally Friendly Use Period" apply to electronic information products whose content of toxic and hazardous substances or elements exceeds the limits specified in SJ/T 11363-2006, which falls within the scope of the "Administrative Measures for Pollution Control of Electronic Information Products." Products that do not contain toxic and hazardous substances or elements do not require a defined environmentally friendly use period; therefore, the "General Rules for Environmentally Friendly Use Period" do not apply.

ECHA Announcement No. 32/2009: Second Batch of Candidate Substances for Inclusion in the List of Substances of Very High Concern

ECHA Announcement No. 32/2009: The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) recently announced the second batch of substances to be included in the Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) candidate list on its website on December 7, 2009. The SVHC candidate list is expected to be officially updated in January 2010. The 15 newly identified Substances of Very High Concern (SHC) are listed in the table below: Substance Name | Chemical Abstracts Service Number (EC Number) | SHC Characteristics | Anthracene Oil | 90640-80-5 | 292-602-7 | Persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity | Anthracene oil, anthracene paste, light oil | 91995-17-4 | 295-278-5 | Persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity | Anthracene oil, anthracene paste, anthracene fraction | 91995-15-2 | Persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity | Anthracene oil, low anthracene content | 90640-82-7 | 292-604-8 | Persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity | Anthracene oil, anthracene paste | 90640-81-6 | 292-603-2 | Persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity | Coal tar pitch, high temperature | 65996-93-2 266-028-2 Persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic carcinogenic (Group II) acrylamide; 79-06-1 201-173-7 Carcinogenic (Group II), mutagenic (Group II) aluminum silicate, refractory ceramic fiber; 650-017-00-8** Carcinogenic (Group II) aluminum zirconate silicate, refractory ceramic fiber; 650-017-00-8** Carcinogenic (Group II) 2,4-dinitrotoluene; 121-

Latest Developments in the EU REACH Regulation

Latest Developments in the EU REACH Regulation: Based on ECHA announcements, the latest developments in the EU's push for the REACH regulation are as follows: (I) ECHA/NA/09/22: ECHA will hold a Substance Indentity Workshop in Helsinki on December 1, 2009. The agenda can be downloaded online: http://echa.europa.eu/doc/press/events/sid_workshop_20091201/sid_workshop_agenda_draft_20091016.pdf. (II) ECHA/NA/09/23: ECHA will hold its third "Stakeholders’ Day" in Helsinki on December 7 of this year. Key topics include CLP (Classification and Labelling), REACH enforcement, and Registration dossiers and compliance. The agenda and related information for this seminar can be found online at: http://echa.europa.eu/news/events/3rd_stakeholders_day_en.asp. (III)

The European Union's ECHA has published 15 recommendations for inclusion in the SVHC candidate list.

The EU's ECHA published 15 recommendations for inclusion in the SVHC candidate list. In accordance with the procedures authorized by the EU REACH Regulation and the requirements of the Executive Committee, the 27 EU Member States and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) published 15 recommendations for inclusion in the SVHC candidate list in September 2009. According to Article 57 of the EU REACH Regulation, substances meeting the following characteristics are considered SVHCs: 1. CMR Class 1 and 2; 2. PBT and vPvB substances; 3. Substances possessing the above characteristics but not belonging to the above categories (such as endocrine disruptors). The EU Member States and ECHA, in accordance with Annex 15 of the REACH Regulation, prepared the files for these 15 recommendations for inclusion in the SVHC candidate list and provided a 45-day consultation period. Comments could be submitted to the ECHA website by October 15, 2009. http://echa.europa.eu/consultations/authorisation/svhc/svhc_cons_en.asp Substance Name, CAS Number, Hazard Category, Anthrace

The EU publishes directives on amended and newly added RoHS exemptions

The European Commission published amendments to RoHS exemptions and new exemptions on June 4 and 10, 2009, respectively, in decisions 2009/428/EC and 2009/443/EC, amending the RoHS Directive (2002/95/EC). 2009/428/EC amended exemption provision 22, and 2009/443/EC added six new exemptions concerning lead, cadmium, and mercury. After sufficient scientific and technical evaluation, the Commission considered that rare earth iron garnet (RIG) Faraday rotators already met the lead content limits of the RoHS Directive (2002/95/EC), and therefore this exemption should be reviewed. Therefore, 2009/428/EEC amended provision 22 to: 22. Lead as an impurity in rare earth iron garnet (RIG) Faraday rotators used in fiber optic communication systems, with the exemption period ending on December 31, 2009. 22. Lead as impurity in RIG (rare earth iron garnet) Faraday rotators used for fiber optic communication systems until 31 December 2009. Directive 2009/443/EC added six RoHS exemptions, the applications of which are: 33. In power transformers, used for...

EU WEEE electronic waste recycling issues

EU WEEE e-waste recycling issues It has been 4 years since the EU WEEE directive came into effect. A study conducted by the European Recycling Platform (ERP) found that there are many amendments to improve the WEEE directive. This research report also points out that even though the EU has adequate capabilities to process and manage e-waste, a large amount of e-waste is still secretly transported to countries outside the EU. Since 2005, the e-waste collected in Ireland has accumulated to 138,000 tons, and in 2008, the collection rate per resident in Ireland was 9.1 kilograms, far exceeding the 4 kilograms required by the WEEE Directive. In Ireland, 100% of e-waste goes to Collection and Recycling Organizations and is disposed of in full compliance with the Directive. But not all EU member states are in the same situation as Ireland. The European Recycling Platform also found that electronic waste collected in the EU is all disposed of in an environmentally friendly and good manner. It was found that only the 30% worthless e-waste was sent to collection and recycling organizations, while the 70% valuable e-waste was sold elsewhere without traceable records. Manufacturers pay 400-500 million euros a year to support the establishment of collection and recycling organizations. The results

The EU has published new draft amendments to the RoHS and WEEE directives

The European Union announced the new revised draft versions of the RoHS and WEEE directives. On September 3, 2009, the European Council Secretariat proposed new revised versions of the RoHS Directive and the WEEE Directive to representatives of EU member states. On December 3 last year, the European Commission proposed to amend the RoHS Directive and the WEEE Directive, with the purpose of strengthening the rigor of the directive, increasing the responsibility of manufacturers and strengthening the market surveillance system of the 27 EU countries. Revised RoHS Directive: The draft covers all electrical and electronic equipment, except for excluded items. Annexes I and II of the original proposed text (respectively the categories of electrical and electronic equipment and products falling into the relevant categories) have been deleted from the draft content. The draft has excluded defense (military) equipment. Such equipment is part of other equipment that does not fall into the scope of RoHS regulations and is not sold as a single function or commercial product. The latest products added to the exclusion list include large stationary industrial tools and pipe organ instruments. The purpose of the RoHS directive is to limit the content of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. Draft Article 4 stipulates that electrical and electronic equipment, including replacement parts placed on the market for repair or reuse, shall not contain substances listed in Annex 4. The restricted substances listed in Annex IV are the same as those already restricted in the current RoHS Directive, namely lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, polybrominated biphenyl (PBB) and dibrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE). No new substances have been added. restricted substances. The RoHS draft contains a number of responsibilities that manufacturers, importers and distributors should bear. in electrical and electronic equipment

The United States has discovered children's toys that do not comply with CPSIA regulations.

Since the Consumer Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) took effect on August 14, 2008, it has required that children's toys meet the following limits: 1. February 10, 2009 (180 days after the Act took effect): < 600 ppm 2. August 15, 2009 (1 year after the Act took effect): < 300 ppm 3. August 14, 2011 (3 years after the Act took effect, if technically feasible): < 100 ppm The Illinois Public Interest Research Group (Illinois PIRG), located in Chicago, conducted random tests this year on 87 popular toys for lead and plasticizer content and published the results. The test results found that...

The EU is phasing out incandescent light bulbs in phases.

From September 1, 2009, the EU market began phasing out energy-inefficient traditional incandescent and halogen light bulbs until September 2016, although the most widely used 40-watt and 25-watt bulbs were phased out by September 2012. The EU banned these products under the Environmental Design Directive 2005/32/EC (EuP Directive), with the implementing measure being European Commission Regulation No. 244/2009, published in the Official Journal of the European Union on March 24, 2009. From September 1st of this year, all energy-inefficient non-transparent luminaires are being phased out. All non-transparent luminaires must fall under EU Energy Label Category A. In other words, non-transparent luminaires must be energy-efficient fluorescent lamps that are 80% more energy-efficient than traditional incandescent bulbs, or light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Consumers who prefer other lighting technologies for aesthetic, size, or shape reasons can purchase transparent luminaires. From September 1, 2009, luminaires with a light output equivalent to a 100-watt transparent conventional incandescent bulb must be classified as at least Category C; by the end of 2012, luminaires with a light output equivalent to other wattage transparent conventional incandescent bulbs must also be classified as at least Category C. The most widely used 60-watt bulbs could remain on the market until September 2011; 40-watt and 25-watt bulbs could continue to be sold until September 2012. The phase-out program starting September 1st only applies to products already removed from the market, i.e., products sold by EU manufacturers or importers. Therefore, in September...

U.S. Energy Star announces new TV requirements

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will revise energy requirements for televisions this year. Televisions certified under Energy Star will need to consume approximately 40% less electricity than conventional models. The new energy standards are expected to save consumers approximately $2.5 billion in electricity bills annually and reduce greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to the annual emissions of approximately 3 million vehicles. The two new Energy Star energy standards (Versions 4 and 5) are expected to take effect on May 1, 2010, and May 1, 2012, respectively. Television manufacturers applying for Energy Star certification after these dates will be required to meet its content requirements. Data shows that approximately 19 million televisions larger than 40 inches will be available in the U.S. in 2010, and Energy Star requirements will regulate the power consumption of large-screen televisions. For example, the new Energy Star requirements stipulate that televisions larger than 46 and 50 inches must consume approximately 50% less electricity than conventional televisions. The following are the energy consumption requirements for televisions according to Energy Star 4th and 5th editions: – Source: U.S. Energy Star website 2009-09-03 – Translated by Plastics Industry Technology Development Center For reference only, please refer to the original text. Other related downloads: Screen diagonal size Aspect ratio Screen specifications v4. on mode requirements

US climate representatives still haven't reached a consensus on reduction figures.

U.S. Climate Representative Todd Stern, speaking at a global warming conference on June 24, stated, "In our assessment, it is unnecessary to set greenhouse gas reduction targets at 40% below 1990 levels; because from the starting point of our reduction efforts, this is not a realistic approach." The two-day conference, an economic forum discussing energy and climate issues, included representatives from 19 countries and the European Union. These participating countries account for 80% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Convened by U.S. President Obama, the aim was to establish a new climate change pact in response to the expiring Kyoto Protocol. To prevent rising sea levels, increasingly severe storms, droughts, and climate anomalies, UN scientific experts recommend that industrialized countries reduce carbon emissions by 25-40% by 2020. Poorer countries and islands should reduce emissions by more than 45%. However, Todd Stern opposed this proposal, suggesting that the U.S. Congress should set smaller reduction targets. The current US bill proposes reducing emissions of six greenhouse gases to 2005 levels by 2020 and by 83% by 2050. However, data from the Mexico Climate Change Forum indicates that there is currently no international consensus on which year should be designated as the target year for long-term emission reduction plans. Mexico has proposed a so-called "green fund," which is intended for all countries (except very poor countries).

Latest Implementation Status of the Consumer Product Safety Enhancement Act (CPSIA)

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) continues to enforce the provisions of the Enhanced Consumer Product Safety Act. The following outlines key developments from May 18 to June 12, 2009. "The CPSC rejects ballpoint pen exemption application, will not postpone implementation of regulations." The CPSC can exempt certain products or materials from the lead content restrictions of the Enhanced Consumer Product Safety Act, provided that the Commission believes that the use of such lead-containing products will not be absorbed by the human body or endanger public health and safety. In February, the Writing Instrument Manufacturers Association wrote to the Commission requesting an exemption for ballpoint pen tips. These tips may contain between 0.1% and 5% lead, and the association claimed that there are currently no viable alternatives, and it may take two years or longer to develop one. CPSC members agreed that the chance of lead release from such products was low; however, given that the Enhanced Consumer Product Safety Act prohibits exemptions for any situation where lead may be absorbed by the human body, the Commission recommended rejecting the Writing Instrument Manufacturers Association's request, and the Commission voted against the association's application in early June. The CPSC also refused to postpone the implementation of the lead content restrictions for such products. However, Thomas Moore, acting chairman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, pointed out that most ballpoint pens are not children's products and therefore are not subject to the lead content restrictions under the Enhanced Consumer Product Safety Act. Lead content restrictions only apply to ballpoint pens intended for children aged 12 or under; general-purpose ballpoint pens are not subject to lead content restrictions, regardless of whether these products are sold or used in schools.

Ban on leaded wheel weights and flame retardants implemented

Recently, several U.S. states have implemented policies to improve product safety and reduce the environmental impact of consumer and industrial products. However, regulatory agencies and legislators in California, Washington, Vermont, and other environmentally conscious states are dissatisfied with the effectiveness of current policies and hope to further protect their natural resources and prevent public harm from toxic substances in products. Therefore, they are tightening existing laws to further prohibit the sale of products containing harmful chemicals and heavy metals. California, Maine, Vermont, and Washington have completely banned the use of lead-based wheel weights. Wheel weights are primarily used to balance wheels and prevent abnormal vibrations at high speeds. Washington state passed a law (HB 1033) on April 28, 2011, requiring anyone replacing wheels or installing wheel weights to use more environmentally friendly wheel weights, meaning the weights must contain no more than 0.5% by weight of chemicals and metals of concern. This law aims to prevent lead-based wheel weights from posing a threat to the environment. Fragments of leaded wheel balancing weights are scattered on the road as vehicles travel, affecting pedestrian health and polluting soil, groundwater, and water surfaces, posing a threat to downstream aquatic life. Lead is known to be harmful to human health, especially children. Maine implemented similar measures on May 12th. The law not only bans the use of leaded wheel balancing weights but also extends the ban to mercury-containing wheel balancing weights, taking effect on January 1, 2011. Furthermore, starting January 1, 2012, the state prohibited new vehicles from being equipped with any leaded wheel balancing weights.

The EU has proposed prioritizing the inclusion of substances in Annex 14.

On June 1, 2009, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) first recommended banning the sale or use of seven substances in the EU market, with exceptions for licensees. ECHA had previously drafted a list of 15 "Substances of Very High Concern" (SVHCs) on October 28, 2008, deeming it necessary to assess the harmfulness of these substances and ultimately restrict their sale and use in the EU market. ECHA selected seven substances from these 15 for priority authorization for regulation. SVHCs include substances classified as Group 1 or 2 carcinogenic, teratogenic, or reproductively toxic (CMR); persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) substances; or very persistent and very bioaccumulative (vPvB) substances; or substances with scientific evidence that can cause equally serious effects on humans or the environment, such as endocrine disruptors. The seven substances for priority authorization for regulation include: 1. Musk xylene (very persistent and very bioaccumulative). Fragrance enhancers used in dishwashing liquids, fabric softeners, etc. 2. 4,4&

The 2009 Electronic Information Product Pollution Prevention and Control Standards Working Group Meeting was held in Nanchang

From May 19 to 21, 2009, the China Department of Energy Conservation and Integrated Utilization held a meeting of the 2009 Standards for the Prevention and Control of Pollution from Electronic Information Products in Nanchang, Jiangxi. The meeting summarized the work of the 2008 Standards Working Group on Pollution Prevention and Control of Electronic Information Products and studied and deployed the 2009 tasks. More than 80 representatives from 65 member units of the Standards Working Group attended the meeting. Yang Tiesheng, Deputy Director of the Energy Conservation Department of the Ministry, put forward several requirements for the standard work on pollution prevention and control of electronic information products in his speech: – Reference source: Ministry of Industry and Information Technology 2009-05-31 The main task of the 2009 Pollution Prevention and Control Standards Working Group is to continue to improve the pollution control standard system for electronic information products Cooperate with the Energy Conservation Division to accelerate the research on the certification model of pollution control of electronic information products and the formulation of the Key Management Catalog of Pollution Control of Electronic Information Products; In 2008, the Pollution Prevention and Control Standards Working Group actively promoted the drafting of project standards such as the General Rules for Environmental Protection Use Terms, and launched the Requirements for Pollution Control Markings for Electronic and Electrical Products and Pollution Control for Electronic and Electrical Products

The European Commission will amend the ELV and RoHS directive exemption projects

Based on the consultation draft on lead and mercury in automobiles and electrical and electronic products published by the European Commission on June 8, 2009, it is speculated that the European Commission is considering revising the exemption clauses of the Waste Automobile Vehicles Directive (ELV) and the Waste Electrical and Electronic Products Directive (RoHS). The first consultation draft concerns 10 exemption clauses under the existing EU ELV Directive, as well as 2 potential new exemption clauses. Questions included requests from EU and Asian automotive manufacturers to discuss "new restrictions, deadlines for existing exemptions, and exemptions for lead in thermoelectric generators, etc., and to provide insights or suggestions." The second consultation draft seeks input from stakeholders regarding new RoHS exemption clauses. One potential exemption is for lead and cadmium in ceramic tile glazes, as manufacturers claim there are currently no alternatives. Both consultation drafts were open until August 3 and were jointly implemented by the Oko and Fraunhofer Institutes in Germany. The European Commission is expected to announce six new exemptions soon. The incoming Swedish president also hopes to finalize these exemptions by the end of this year.

error: Content protected