跳至主要內容
  • Home
  • About Lion
    • About Lion
    • Competitive Comparison
    • Production Process
  • Products
  • News
  • Certificates
    • Patents
    • Certificate of Analysis
  • Contact
  • Members
  • Home
  • About Lion
    • About Lion
    • Competitive Comparison
    • Production Process
  • Products
  • News
  • Certificates
    • Patents
    • Certificate of Analysis
  • Contact
  • Members
English
English 繁體中文 简体中文

News

News

Article classification

  • Environmental protection regulations
  • Global environmental current affairs
  • EU WEEE Directive and Current Affairs
  • EU RoHS Directives and Regulations
  • REACH related regulations and current affairs
  • European Union Standards Organization-EN13427~EN13432
  • European Chemical Agency (ECHA)
  • German two-way system DSD-green dot mark
  • EU Energy Use Products Directive
  • Environmental and ecological related reports
  • Articles
  • Pallet specifications by country
sergei-a-heLWtuAN3c-unsplash-scaled-1

News

>Global environmental current affairs

Search results: 723 articles

US climate representatives still haven't reached a consensus on reduction figures.

U.S. Climate Representative Todd Stern, speaking at a global warming conference on June 24, stated, "In our assessment, it is unnecessary to set greenhouse gas reduction targets at 40% below 1990 levels; because from the starting point of our reduction efforts, this is not a realistic approach." The two-day conference, an economic forum discussing energy and climate issues, included representatives from 19 countries and the European Union. These participating countries account for 80% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Convened by U.S. President Obama, the aim was to establish a new climate change pact in response to the expiring Kyoto Protocol. To prevent rising sea levels, increasingly severe storms, droughts, and climate anomalies, UN scientific experts recommend that industrialized countries reduce carbon emissions by 25-40% by 2020. Poorer countries and islands should reduce emissions by more than 45%. However, Todd Stern opposed this proposal, suggesting that the U.S. Congress should set smaller reduction targets. The current US bill proposes reducing emissions of six greenhouse gases to 2005 levels by 2020 and by 83% by 2050. However, data from the Mexico Climate Change Forum indicates that there is currently no international consensus on which year should be designated as the target year for long-term emission reduction plans. Mexico has proposed a so-called "green fund," which is intended for all countries (except very poor countries).

2009-11-07

Latest Implementation Status of the Consumer Product Safety Enhancement Act (CPSIA)

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) continues to enforce the provisions of the Enhanced Consumer Product Safety Act. The following outlines key developments from May 18 to June 12, 2009. "The CPSC rejects ballpoint pen exemption application, will not postpone implementation of regulations." The CPSC can exempt certain products or materials from the lead content restrictions of the Enhanced Consumer Product Safety Act, provided that the Commission believes that the use of such lead-containing products will not be absorbed by the human body or endanger public health and safety. In February, the Writing Instrument Manufacturers Association wrote to the Commission requesting an exemption for ballpoint pen tips. These tips may contain between 0.1% and 5% lead, and the association claimed that there are currently no viable alternatives, and it may take two years or longer to develop one. CPSC members agreed that the chance of lead release from such products was low; however, given that the Enhanced Consumer Product Safety Act prohibits exemptions for any situation where lead may be absorbed by the human body, the Commission recommended rejecting the Writing Instrument Manufacturers Association's request, and the Commission voted against the association's application in early June. The CPSC also refused to postpone the implementation of the lead content restrictions for such products. However, Thomas Moore, acting chairman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, pointed out that most ballpoint pens are not children's products and therefore are not subject to the lead content restrictions under the Enhanced Consumer Product Safety Act. Lead content restrictions only apply to ballpoint pens intended for children aged 12 or under; general-purpose ballpoint pens are not subject to lead content restrictions, regardless of whether these products are sold or used in schools.

2009-11-07

Ban on leaded wheel weights and flame retardants implemented

Recently, several U.S. states have implemented policies to improve product safety and reduce the environmental impact of consumer and industrial products. However, regulatory agencies and legislators in California, Washington, Vermont, and other environmentally conscious states are dissatisfied with the effectiveness of current policies and hope to further protect their natural resources and prevent public harm from toxic substances in products. Therefore, they are tightening existing laws to further prohibit the sale of products containing harmful chemicals and heavy metals. California, Maine, Vermont, and Washington have completely banned the use of lead-based wheel weights. Wheel weights are primarily used to balance wheels and prevent abnormal vibrations at high speeds. Washington state passed a law (HB 1033) on April 28, 2011, requiring anyone replacing wheels or installing wheel weights to use more environmentally friendly wheel weights, meaning the weights must contain no more than 0.5% by weight of chemicals and metals of concern. This law aims to prevent lead-based wheel weights from posing a threat to the environment. Fragments of leaded wheel balancing weights are scattered on the road as vehicles travel, affecting pedestrian health and polluting soil, groundwater, and water surfaces, posing a threat to downstream aquatic life. Lead is known to be harmful to human health, especially children. Maine implemented similar measures on May 12th. The law not only bans the use of leaded wheel balancing weights but also extends the ban to mercury-containing wheel balancing weights, taking effect on January 1, 2011. Furthermore, starting January 1, 2012, the state prohibited new vehicles from being equipped with any leaded wheel balancing weights.

2009-11-07

The 2009 Electronic Information Product Pollution Prevention and Control Standards Working Group Meeting was held in Nanchang

From May 19 to 21, 2009, the China Department of Energy Conservation and Integrated Utilization held a meeting of the 2009 Standards for the Prevention and Control of Pollution from Electronic Information Products in Nanchang, Jiangxi. The meeting summarized the work of the 2008 Standards Working Group on Pollution Prevention and Control of Electronic Information Products and studied and deployed the 2009 tasks. More than 80 representatives from 65 member units of the Standards Working Group attended the meeting. Yang Tiesheng, Deputy Director of the Energy Conservation Department of the Ministry, put forward several requirements for the standard work on pollution prevention and control of electronic information products in his speech: – Reference source: Ministry of Industry and Information Technology 2009-05-31 The main task of the 2009 Pollution Prevention and Control Standards Working Group is to continue to improve the pollution control standard system for electronic information products Cooperate with the Energy Conservation Division to accelerate the research on the certification model of pollution control of electronic information products and the formulation of the Key Management Catalog of Pollution Control of Electronic Information Products; In 2008, the Pollution Prevention and Control Standards Working Group actively promoted the drafting of project standards such as the General Rules for Environmental Protection Use Terms, and launched the Requirements for Pollution Control Markings for Electronic and Electrical Products and Pollution Control for Electronic and Electrical Products

2009-11-07

The European Commission will amend the ELV and RoHS directive exemption projects

Based on the consultation draft on lead and mercury in automobiles and electrical and electronic products published by the European Commission on June 8, 2009, it is speculated that the European Commission is considering revising the exemption clauses of the Waste Automobile Vehicles Directive (ELV) and the Waste Electrical and Electronic Products Directive (RoHS). The first consultation draft concerns 10 exemption clauses under the existing EU ELV Directive, as well as 2 potential new exemption clauses. Questions included requests from EU and Asian automotive manufacturers to discuss "new restrictions, deadlines for existing exemptions, and exemptions for lead in thermoelectric generators, etc., and to provide insights or suggestions." The second consultation draft seeks input from stakeholders regarding new RoHS exemption clauses. One potential exemption is for lead and cadmium in ceramic tile glazes, as manufacturers claim there are currently no alternatives. Both consultation drafts were open until August 3 and were jointly implemented by the Oko and Fraunhofer Institutes in Germany. The European Commission is expected to announce six new exemptions soon. The incoming Swedish president also hopes to finalize these exemptions by the end of this year.

2009-11-07

Avoid static electricity, manage systematically

On February 18, 2009, SGS received its first authorization from ESDA, allowing it to conduct certification business based on IEC 61340-5-1:2007. IEC 61340-5-1:2007 is another new international anti-static certification standard besides ESDS 20.20:2007, issued by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Before August 2007, this standard was only a technical specification and had not yet become an international standard. IEC 61340-5-1:2007 is an update to ESDS 20.20:2007, and currently, European and Japanese companies tend to prefer certification based on IEC 61340-5-1. For customers requiring ESDS 20.20:2007 certification, their electrostatic discharge protection systems can also be easily converted to IEC 61340-5-1:2007. As a globally renowned certification service provider, SGS has always possessed strong technical capabilities and extensive experience in the field of antistatic certification and training. This authorization further demonstrates SGS's leading position in the certification industry.

2009-05-08

A Nordic survey last year found electronic toys that did not comply with the RoHS directive.

Last year, the environmental agencies of the three Nordic countries (Denmark, Sweden, and Finland) conducted a RoHS compliance investigation, testing 24 electronic toys. The results showed that the lead content in the solder of three of these toys (one of which was a remote-controlled airplane) exceeded the RoHS directive limits. Surprisingly, these products all came with complete assessment and compliance reports indicating RoHS compliance, leading authorities to suspect that the reports may have been falsified or illegal. The RoHS directive, which came into effect on July 1, 2006, stipulates that six hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment sold within the EU must not exceed specified limits. These six restricted substances are lead, cadmium, mercury, hexavalent chromium, and two brominated flame retardants (PBB and PBDE). Although products that do not comply with the RoHS directive have been removed from the market, environmentalists worry that despite manufacturers providing compliance reports, they may not actually meet the requirements. With millions of electronic devices in the EU market, monitoring and enforcement are a heavy burden for the competent authorities of member states; therefore, it is possible that some counterfeit or non-compliant products are still circulating in the EU market. Another investigation by Nordic authorities into 152 electronic products found that 20 of them did not comply with the RoHS directive. The non-compliant products included electric glue guns with excessive lead content in their nozzles. A Swedish importer who imported unbranded electric glue guns from China has been punished, and the batch of products has been sent to [a designated supplier/organization].

2009-03-25

The European Environment Committee supports a phased ban on incandescent light bulbs.

On February 17, 2009, the European Parliament’s environment committee expressed its support for a proposal put forward by the European Commission to phase out incandescent light bulbs in stages from 2009 to 2012, replacing them with energy-efficient fluorescent and halogen light bulbs. The Commission stated that consumers using low-energy bulbs could save on electricity bills and significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions annually. It was estimated that each household could save €25 to €50 per year. The Commission anticipated that this would save approximately 40 trillion terawatt-hours of electricity and reduce carbon dioxide emissions by approximately 15 million metric tons annually. Directive 2005/32/EC (EuP Directive) is a framework directive on the environmental design of energy-consuming products, aiming to harmonize relevant directives within the European Union to prevent environmental regulations from becoming barriers to trade within the region. With the assistance of the Environmental Design Oversight Committee, the Executive Committee may formulate implementation measures for individual products and related environmental matters (such as energy consumption, waste generation, and water consumption). The Executive Committee may also set minimum energy efficiency and performance requirements for products (such as consumer electronics and household appliances).

2009-03-25

The European Parliament calls for expanding the scope of eco-labeling.

The European Commission submitted a document last July recommending a review of the ecolabeling guidelines, which is currently being considered by the European Parliament and the Council. On February 17th of this year, the European Parliament's Environment Committee published a report advocating for wider adoption of the EU ecolabel. The report stated that the EU should simplify the ecolabeling process, reduce issuance fees, and make it easier for businesses of all sizes to apply for labels, while welcoming the Commission's proposal to expand the scope of applicable products. The EU launched the ecolabeling scheme in 1992, issuing ecolabels to products that contribute to environmental improvement. The EU revised the scheme in 2000. According to Regulation 1980/2000, the ecolabeling scheme is voluntary and not intended to differentiate EU products from foreign products. According to the regulation, each product category must meet certain ecological criteria (such as impact on climate change, energy and resource consumption, and waste recycling) to be eligible for an ecolabel. The goal of these ecological criteria is to ensure that only products and services with minimal environmental impact over their lifespan are eligible for an ecolabel. The European Commission launched a review on July 16th last year, hoping to improve the effectiveness and market impact of the eco-labeling regulations by expanding the categories of eligible products and increasing the number of eco-labeled products and services available to consumers, thereby educating consumers to buy more environmentally friendly products. Products and services awarded the eco-label all bear a floral logo for easy consumer identification. To date, more than 3,000 products have been awarded the eco-label. Eco-labeling program

2009-03-25

The UK government is moving to revise domestic WEEE regulations

In accordance with the requirements of the EU WEEE Directive, EU member states must convert the WEEE Directive into the domestic laws of each member state. The British government submitted its domestic WEEE regulations (SI 2006 No. 3289) to Parliament on December 12, 2006, and submitted it to Parliament in January 2007. Effective on March 2nd. Before the British WEEE regulations are about to enter into force for the fourth year (January 1st to December 31st, 2010), the British government conducted an impact assessment (Impact Assessment) on its domestic WEEE implementation status and implementation experience, and announced the upcoming regulations. Draft regulations are available for public consultation. The deadline for this public consultation is April 6, 2009. The British government recently announced a report titled “The Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Regulations: Government consultation on new regulations and further development of the supporting infrastructure to take effect from the fourth compliance period (1 January – 31 December

2009-03-01

Washington state in the United States is considering legislation to regulate bisphenol A.

Washington state is considering legislation to ban the manufacture, sale, and distribution of water bottles, children's water bottles, cups, and other containers containing bisphenol A (BPA), effective July 1, 2010. If passed, the ban would cover: BPA is used to manufacture epoxy resins and polycarbonate plastics, and is a major component of hard polycarbonate plastics. Polycarbonate plastics are used in various food and beverage packaging products, while epoxy resins are commonly used as a clear coating for metal products. BPA is also used in various children's products, such as toys, pacifiers, bottles, and teethers; however, due to increasing public concern, many manufacturers have voluntarily phased out the use of BPA in their products. Several U.S. states and cities have attempted to ban the use of BPA in children's products, but failed, including San Francisco and California. The Consumer Product Safety Enhancement Act prohibits the use of certain phthalates, but does not restrict BPA. At the federal level, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is reviewing data on all products regulated by the agency, including those known to contain bisphenol A (BPA). The Obama administration is expected to take a more proactive approach to the BPA issue, and future federal regulations on this chemical may become even stricter. – Reference source:

2009-03-01

US electronics manufacturers are required to pay a minimum annual fee of $50,000 per year to recycle E-waste

According to the manufacturer registration fee schedule published by NERIC (National Electronics Recycling Infrastructure Clearinghouse) (see table below), in 2009, manufacturers of electronic products subject to mandatory recycling in the United States were required to pay at least $50,000 annually in registration fees for nationwide product recycling, depending on the state. Several U.S. states have implemented mandatory electronic recycling programs, and the administrative costs of these programs are covered by registration fees levied on electronic product manufacturers. Maryland and West Virginia use these funds to subsidize local electronic waste collection and recycling, while other states typically use them to pay employee salaries, extend services, and for implementation. State Name | Manufacturer Registration Fee California | None Connecticut | To be determined Hawaii | $5,000 Illinois | $5,000 Maine | None Maryland | $5,000

2009-03-01

The U.S. CPSC will provide manufacturers with guidelines for complying with CPSIA

Chapter 108 of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) restricts the levels of phthalates in children's toys and child care products. Three phthalates (DEHP, DBP, and BBP) are permanently banned, and their permitted concentration in children's toys and child care products is 0.1%. The other three temporarily banned substances, DINP, DIDP, and DnOP, must not exceed 0.1% in "children's toys that can be put in a child's mouth" and "child care products." This ban took effect on February 10, 2009. Definitions such as "children's toys," "children's toys that can be put in a child's mouth," and "child care products" are detailed in Chapter 108. It is important to note that these definitions apply only to Chapter 108 of the CPSIA. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has received numerous inquiries from manufacturers potentially affected by the act; therefore, the Commission is currently developing guidelines for manufacturers to determine whether their products must comply with the requirements of the act. Currently, it is known that products already regulated by other federal agencies, such as food, cosmetics, and medical devices, generally do not fall under the category of "consumer products." However, items like baby pacifiers and cups are subject to the jurisdiction of both the CPSC and the FDA (Food and Drug Administration). The FDA regulates additives that are indirectly added to food, such as those that may be released from the container.

2009-03-01

China accelerates action plan to promote energy-saving lamps

To accelerate energy conservation and carbon reduction, gradually phase out incandescent lamps, and expedite the promotion of energy-saving lamps, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), in cooperation with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Global Environment Facility (GEF), has launched the "China's Phasing Out of Incandescent Lamps and Accelerating the Promotion of Energy-Saving Lamps" project, supporting the research and development of the "Action Plan for China's Phasing Out of Incandescent Lamps and Accelerating the Promotion of Energy-Saving Lamps." Currently, related research has begun. China is a major producer and consumer of lighting products. In 2007, China produced 4.44 billion incandescent lamps, accounting for one-third of the world's production, with 2.98 billion exported; and produced 3 billion compact fluorescent lamps, accounting for 80% of the world's production, with 2.2 billion exported. Lighting accounts for approximately 12% of China's total electricity consumption. Replacing incandescent lamps with energy-saving lamps can save 60% to 80% of electricity. If all existing incandescent lamps were replaced with energy-saving lamps, 48 ​​billion kilowatt-hours of electricity could be saved annually, representing a huge potential and an important way to achieve energy conservation and carbon reduction goals. – Reference source: Hong Kong Trade Development Council (HKTDC) 2009-02-01

2009-03-01

The most environmentally friendly electronic products by Greenpeace

Following its quarterly Guide to Greener Electronics, Greenpeace invited electronics manufacturers in 2008 to submit their most environmentally friendly products/models for evaluation, surveying the most environmentally friendly products on the market and publishing the results in December 2008. This survey, titled "Green Electronic…The search continues," included 15 participating manufacturers: Acer, Dell, Fujitsu Siemens, Hewlett Packard, Lenovo, LG Electronics, Motorola, Nokia, Panasonic, RIM/Blackberry, Sharp, Samsung, Sony, Sony Ericsson, and Toshiba. These 15 manufacturers submitted 50 products for Greenpeace to evaluate. The evaluation criteria were divided into four main categories: 1. Use of hazardous chemical substances: Hazardous substances included PVC, brominated flame retardants (BRFs), antimony, and phthalates.

2009-03-01

Energy efficiency labeling for household induction cookers will be mandatory in China starting March 1st.

Starting March 1, 2009, China will enforce the "Implementation Rules for Energy Efficiency Labeling of Household Induction Cookers," prohibiting the sale of induction cookers without energy efficiency labels. This will eliminate 10% to 15% of high-energy-consuming household induction cookers from the market. On September 1, 2008, the national standard "Energy Efficiency Limits and Energy Efficiency Grades for Household Induction Cookers" came into full effect, officially ending the long-standing lack of standards for the Chinese induction cooker industry. An official from the China Household Electrical Appliances Association stated that the publication of energy efficiency labels has promoted the positive development of the entire induction cooker industry, maximized consumer protection, and played a significant role in improving the international standing of Chinese product technical standards. According to relevant research, if the entire induction cooker industry can meet the energy-saving standards, based on the current annual sales volume of 50 million units, this is equivalent to saving the country more than 1.5 million tons of standard coal annually, greatly contributing to the construction of an energy-saving society. According to reports, the energy efficiency standard for induction cookers is divided into five levels, thus limiting the market entry threshold. Products with energy efficiency below level five will be phased out and will not be allowed to be produced or sold. Consumers will be able to easily select products by checking the label. Source: Jiangsu WTO-TBT Information Service Network 

2009-03-01

Pay attention to FSC-controlled timber risk assessment to avoid economic losses in timber trade.

Companies that have obtained FSC-mixed certification and use controlled timber will find that since the FSC organization implemented the FSC-STD-40-005 V2 standard (Company Assessment Standard for FSC Controlled Timber) on January 1, 2007, the requirements for controlling FSC-controlled timber have become increasingly detailed and stringent. Many companies feel that the new standard adds significantly more content than FSC-STD-40-005 V1 in implementing controlled timber management. Some companies even believe that controlling timber management is impossible for some domestic timber processors to fully implement, especially in the risk assessment stage. However, it is important to note that if a company purchases controlled timber but neglects certain requirements during the risk assessment process, the purchased materials may not be usable in the production of FSC-mixed products, or the produced products may not be able to be sold as FSC-certified products. The resulting economic losses could be substantial. Therefore, we should spend more time conducting risk assessments for controlled timber. FSC-controlled timber should avoid the following five sources: FSC-STD-40-005 V2 provides two methods for sourcing controlled timber. The first is to purchase raw materials from suppliers who have obtained FSC-controlled timber sales qualifications. The second is for the company to conduct its own FSC-controlled timber assessment process and purchase raw materials from non-certified suppliers. The first method is the simplest, but currently only two companies in China have obtained FSC certification.

2009-02-12

IECQ Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

1. Some companies believe that as long as a test report shows the content of heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, mercury, and hexavalent metals, it can be used to determine the RoHS compliance of materials. For example, some companies use test reports collected regarding the European EN71-3 toy safety standard to determine RoHS compliance. Is this acceptable? Answer: No. EN71-3-9 specifies the "leaching amount" under certain environmental conditions, while RoHS specifies the "content" of materials. The sample preparation methods for the two tests are different, and the results may differ greatly. Test data cannot be substituted for each other. 2. The purchased parts contain multiple colors, but the test report only shows the content of hazardous substances in one color. Can such a report be used to determine the RoHS compliance of materials? Answer: No. 3. When there is only a test result for a single homogeneous material in an assembly, can it be used to determine the RoHS compliance of the entire assembly? Answer: No. It can only prove that this one product is compliant. 4. For processes that may involve contamination, switching cleaning methods are usually used to prevent cross-contamination, but their effectiveness is difficult to verify. What are some reference suggestions (or experiences) for practice? A: The cleaning and verification methods should be determined based on the level of pollution risk. Evidence of cleaning capability can be considered from several aspects: 5. For factories that have completed RoHS switching, all products need to meet RoHS requirements. In this case, is labeling a key control item? A: 6. How to verify the materials provided by the supplier?

2008-12-24

IECQ QC 080000 Standard Interpretation Part 3

7.1 Planning of Hazardous Substance Reduction Processes and Product Realization The requirements of ISO 9001 shall be used in conjunction with the following requirements. The organization shall plan and develop processes for the realization of hazardous substances-reduced products. In planning the realization of hazardous substances-reduced products, the organization shall, where appropriate, determine the following: a) Quality objectives and requirements for the hazardous substances-reduced product; b) The need to establish hazardous substances reduction processes, documentation, and resources for the hazardous substances-reduced product; c) The verification, validation, monitoring, inspection, and testing activities required for the hazardous substances-reduced product, and the acceptance criteria for the product. Where appropriate, information service providers shall be included; d) Procedure documents or work instructions for processes using restricted substances, so as to include preventative measures in the presence of contamination; e) Evidence required to demonstrate that the hazardous substances reduction realization process and the resulting product meet the requirements; f) The output of the hazardous substances reduction planning shall be in a form suitable to the organization's operating methods. Note 1: Documents used to determine the hazardous substances reduction process (including product realization process) and resources for a product may be called a quality plan. c. On-site audits; d. Random spot checks (the frequency and sampling plan are determined based on risk analysis); e. Management of samples sent by customers. Product realization refers to all processes involved in creating a product. Essentially, it's the process from customer needs to mass production of a product. This differs from product design and development, which involves translating regulatory, technical, safety, functional, market, or other product requirements into technical specifications.

2008-12-24

REACH’s impact on traders and their responses

The "European Union Regulations on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals" (REACH) is called "the most complex foreign technical barrier with the widest impact that China has ever encountered". The scope and extent of its impact can be imagined Know. The impact of REACH on different manufacturing industries can be easily found in various media and professional journals, which is very helpful for manufacturing companies. So, does REACH only affect product manufacturers? Does REACH have any direct requirements for dealers who export to the EU? Will it have an impact? What are the impacts? What needs to be done to ensure normal trade? These will be the main focus of this article, and they are also issues that European dealers must pay attention to. 1. Distributors and export trade categories The REACH regulations clearly define "distributors", which refer to natural or legal persons in the EU who only store substances or place substances on the market for third parties, including retailers. Distributors within the scope of this definition obviously refer to companies established in the EU that are engaged in product storage or sales. Domestic distributors do not fall into the category of EU distributors. The dealers considered in this article are enterprises that only engage in import and export trade and do not produce themselves, especially those that export to the EU. If a dealer is producing at the same time, he is actually a "non-EU manufacturer" within the scope of REACH, and the terms of "non-EU manufacturer" apply, which is beyond the scope of this article. Judging from the registered address and scope of operations, distribution

2008-12-24
First page« Previous 10 pages« Previous page3334353637Next Page »Next 10 pages »Last page

Article classification

  • Environmental protection regulations
  • Global environmental current affairs
  • EU WEEE Directive and Current Affairs
  • EU RoHS Directives and Regulations
  • REACH related regulations and current affairs
  • European Union Standards Organization-EN13427~EN13432
  • European Chemical Agency (ECHA)
  • German two-way system DSD-green dot mark
  • EU Energy Use Products Directive
  • Environmental and ecological related reports
  • Articles
  • Pallet specifications by country
sergei-a-heLWtuAN3c-unsplash-scaled-1

News

>Global environmental current affairs

US climate representatives still haven't reached a consensus on reduction figures.

2009-11-07

U.S. Climate Representative Todd Stern, speaking at a global warming conference on June 24, stated, "In our assessment, it is unnecessary to set greenhouse gas reduction targets at 40% below 1990 levels; because from the starting point of our reduction efforts, this is not a realistic approach." The two-day conference, an economic forum discussing energy and climate issues, included representatives from 19 countries and the European Union. These participating countries account for 80% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Convened by U.S. President Obama, the aim was to establish a new climate change pact in response to the expiring Kyoto Protocol. To prevent rising sea levels, increasingly severe storms, droughts, and climate anomalies, UN scientific experts recommend that industrialized countries reduce carbon emissions by 25-40% by 2020. Poorer countries and islands should reduce emissions by more than 45%. However, Todd Stern opposed this proposal, suggesting that the U.S. Congress should set smaller reduction targets. The current US bill proposes reducing emissions of six greenhouse gases to 2005 levels by 2020 and by 83% by 2050. However, data from the Mexico Climate Change Forum indicates that there is currently no international consensus on which year should be designated as the target year for long-term emission reduction plans. Mexico has proposed a so-called "green fund," which is intended for all countries (except very poor countries).

Latest Implementation Status of the Consumer Product Safety Enhancement Act (CPSIA)

2009-11-07

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) continues to enforce the provisions of the Enhanced Consumer Product Safety Act. The following outlines key developments from May 18 to June 12, 2009. "The CPSC rejects ballpoint pen exemption application, will not postpone implementation of regulations." The CPSC can exempt certain products or materials from the lead content restrictions of the Enhanced Consumer Product Safety Act, provided that the Commission believes that the use of such lead-containing products will not be absorbed by the human body or endanger public health and safety. In February, the Writing Instrument Manufacturers Association wrote to the Commission requesting an exemption for ballpoint pen tips. These tips may contain between 0.1% and 5% lead, and the association claimed that there are currently no viable alternatives, and it may take two years or longer to develop one. CPSC members agreed that the chance of lead release from such products was low; however, given that the Enhanced Consumer Product Safety Act prohibits exemptions for any situation where lead may be absorbed by the human body, the Commission recommended rejecting the Writing Instrument Manufacturers Association's request, and the Commission voted against the association's application in early June. The CPSC also refused to postpone the implementation of the lead content restrictions for such products. However, Thomas Moore, acting chairman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, pointed out that most ballpoint pens are not children's products and therefore are not subject to the lead content restrictions under the Enhanced Consumer Product Safety Act. Lead content restrictions only apply to ballpoint pens intended for children aged 12 or under; general-purpose ballpoint pens are not subject to lead content restrictions, regardless of whether these products are sold or used in schools.

Ban on leaded wheel weights and flame retardants implemented

2009-11-07

Recently, several U.S. states have implemented policies to improve product safety and reduce the environmental impact of consumer and industrial products. However, regulatory agencies and legislators in California, Washington, Vermont, and other environmentally conscious states are dissatisfied with the effectiveness of current policies and hope to further protect their natural resources and prevent public harm from toxic substances in products. Therefore, they are tightening existing laws to further prohibit the sale of products containing harmful chemicals and heavy metals. California, Maine, Vermont, and Washington have completely banned the use of lead-based wheel weights. Wheel weights are primarily used to balance wheels and prevent abnormal vibrations at high speeds. Washington state passed a law (HB 1033) on April 28, 2011, requiring anyone replacing wheels or installing wheel weights to use more environmentally friendly wheel weights, meaning the weights must contain no more than 0.5% by weight of chemicals and metals of concern. This law aims to prevent lead-based wheel weights from posing a threat to the environment. Fragments of leaded wheel balancing weights are scattered on the road as vehicles travel, affecting pedestrian health and polluting soil, groundwater, and water surfaces, posing a threat to downstream aquatic life. Lead is known to be harmful to human health, especially children. Maine implemented similar measures on May 12th. The law not only bans the use of leaded wheel balancing weights but also extends the ban to mercury-containing wheel balancing weights, taking effect on January 1, 2011. Furthermore, starting January 1, 2012, the state prohibited new vehicles from being equipped with any leaded wheel balancing weights.

The 2009 Electronic Information Product Pollution Prevention and Control Standards Working Group Meeting was held in Nanchang

2009-11-07

From May 19 to 21, 2009, the China Department of Energy Conservation and Integrated Utilization held a meeting of the 2009 Standards for the Prevention and Control of Pollution from Electronic Information Products in Nanchang, Jiangxi. The meeting summarized the work of the 2008 Standards Working Group on Pollution Prevention and Control of Electronic Information Products and studied and deployed the 2009 tasks. More than 80 representatives from 65 member units of the Standards Working Group attended the meeting. Yang Tiesheng, Deputy Director of the Energy Conservation Department of the Ministry, put forward several requirements for the standard work on pollution prevention and control of electronic information products in his speech: – Reference source: Ministry of Industry and Information Technology 2009-05-31 The main task of the 2009 Pollution Prevention and Control Standards Working Group is to continue to improve the pollution control standard system for electronic information products Cooperate with the Energy Conservation Division to accelerate the research on the certification model of pollution control of electronic information products and the formulation of the Key Management Catalog of Pollution Control of Electronic Information Products; In 2008, the Pollution Prevention and Control Standards Working Group actively promoted the drafting of project standards such as the General Rules for Environmental Protection Use Terms, and launched the Requirements for Pollution Control Markings for Electronic and Electrical Products and Pollution Control for Electronic and Electrical Products

The European Commission will amend the ELV and RoHS directive exemption projects

2009-11-07

Based on the consultation draft on lead and mercury in automobiles and electrical and electronic products published by the European Commission on June 8, 2009, it is speculated that the European Commission is considering revising the exemption clauses of the Waste Automobile Vehicles Directive (ELV) and the Waste Electrical and Electronic Products Directive (RoHS). The first consultation draft concerns 10 exemption clauses under the existing EU ELV Directive, as well as 2 potential new exemption clauses. Questions included requests from EU and Asian automotive manufacturers to discuss "new restrictions, deadlines for existing exemptions, and exemptions for lead in thermoelectric generators, etc., and to provide insights or suggestions." The second consultation draft seeks input from stakeholders regarding new RoHS exemption clauses. One potential exemption is for lead and cadmium in ceramic tile glazes, as manufacturers claim there are currently no alternatives. Both consultation drafts were open until August 3 and were jointly implemented by the Oko and Fraunhofer Institutes in Germany. The European Commission is expected to announce six new exemptions soon. The incoming Swedish president also hopes to finalize these exemptions by the end of this year.

Avoid static electricity, manage systematically

2009-05-08

On February 18, 2009, SGS received its first authorization from ESDA, allowing it to conduct certification business based on IEC 61340-5-1:2007. IEC 61340-5-1:2007 is another new international anti-static certification standard besides ESDS 20.20:2007, issued by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Before August 2007, this standard was only a technical specification and had not yet become an international standard. IEC 61340-5-1:2007 is an update to ESDS 20.20:2007, and currently, European and Japanese companies tend to prefer certification based on IEC 61340-5-1. For customers requiring ESDS 20.20:2007 certification, their electrostatic discharge protection systems can also be easily converted to IEC 61340-5-1:2007. As a globally renowned certification service provider, SGS has always possessed strong technical capabilities and extensive experience in the field of antistatic certification and training. This authorization further demonstrates SGS's leading position in the certification industry.

A Nordic survey last year found electronic toys that did not comply with the RoHS directive.

2009-03-25

Last year, the environmental agencies of the three Nordic countries (Denmark, Sweden, and Finland) conducted a RoHS compliance investigation, testing 24 electronic toys. The results showed that the lead content in the solder of three of these toys (one of which was a remote-controlled airplane) exceeded the RoHS directive limits. Surprisingly, these products all came with complete assessment and compliance reports indicating RoHS compliance, leading authorities to suspect that the reports may have been falsified or illegal. The RoHS directive, which came into effect on July 1, 2006, stipulates that six hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment sold within the EU must not exceed specified limits. These six restricted substances are lead, cadmium, mercury, hexavalent chromium, and two brominated flame retardants (PBB and PBDE). Although products that do not comply with the RoHS directive have been removed from the market, environmentalists worry that despite manufacturers providing compliance reports, they may not actually meet the requirements. With millions of electronic devices in the EU market, monitoring and enforcement are a heavy burden for the competent authorities of member states; therefore, it is possible that some counterfeit or non-compliant products are still circulating in the EU market. Another investigation by Nordic authorities into 152 electronic products found that 20 of them did not comply with the RoHS directive. The non-compliant products included electric glue guns with excessive lead content in their nozzles. A Swedish importer who imported unbranded electric glue guns from China has been punished, and the batch of products has been sent to [a designated supplier/organization].

The European Environment Committee supports a phased ban on incandescent light bulbs.

2009-03-25

On February 17, 2009, the European Parliament’s environment committee expressed its support for a proposal put forward by the European Commission to phase out incandescent light bulbs in stages from 2009 to 2012, replacing them with energy-efficient fluorescent and halogen light bulbs. The Commission stated that consumers using low-energy bulbs could save on electricity bills and significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions annually. It was estimated that each household could save €25 to €50 per year. The Commission anticipated that this would save approximately 40 trillion terawatt-hours of electricity and reduce carbon dioxide emissions by approximately 15 million metric tons annually. Directive 2005/32/EC (EuP Directive) is a framework directive on the environmental design of energy-consuming products, aiming to harmonize relevant directives within the European Union to prevent environmental regulations from becoming barriers to trade within the region. With the assistance of the Environmental Design Oversight Committee, the Executive Committee may formulate implementation measures for individual products and related environmental matters (such as energy consumption, waste generation, and water consumption). The Executive Committee may also set minimum energy efficiency and performance requirements for products (such as consumer electronics and household appliances).

The European Parliament calls for expanding the scope of eco-labeling.

2009-03-25

The European Commission submitted a document last July recommending a review of the ecolabeling guidelines, which is currently being considered by the European Parliament and the Council. On February 17th of this year, the European Parliament's Environment Committee published a report advocating for wider adoption of the EU ecolabel. The report stated that the EU should simplify the ecolabeling process, reduce issuance fees, and make it easier for businesses of all sizes to apply for labels, while welcoming the Commission's proposal to expand the scope of applicable products. The EU launched the ecolabeling scheme in 1992, issuing ecolabels to products that contribute to environmental improvement. The EU revised the scheme in 2000. According to Regulation 1980/2000, the ecolabeling scheme is voluntary and not intended to differentiate EU products from foreign products. According to the regulation, each product category must meet certain ecological criteria (such as impact on climate change, energy and resource consumption, and waste recycling) to be eligible for an ecolabel. The goal of these ecological criteria is to ensure that only products and services with minimal environmental impact over their lifespan are eligible for an ecolabel. The European Commission launched a review on July 16th last year, hoping to improve the effectiveness and market impact of the eco-labeling regulations by expanding the categories of eligible products and increasing the number of eco-labeled products and services available to consumers, thereby educating consumers to buy more environmentally friendly products. Products and services awarded the eco-label all bear a floral logo for easy consumer identification. To date, more than 3,000 products have been awarded the eco-label. Eco-labeling program

The UK government is moving to revise domestic WEEE regulations

2009-03-01

In accordance with the requirements of the EU WEEE Directive, EU member states must convert the WEEE Directive into the domestic laws of each member state. The British government submitted its domestic WEEE regulations (SI 2006 No. 3289) to Parliament on December 12, 2006, and submitted it to Parliament in January 2007. Effective on March 2nd. Before the British WEEE regulations are about to enter into force for the fourth year (January 1st to December 31st, 2010), the British government conducted an impact assessment (Impact Assessment) on its domestic WEEE implementation status and implementation experience, and announced the upcoming regulations. Draft regulations are available for public consultation. The deadline for this public consultation is April 6, 2009. The British government recently announced a report titled “The Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Regulations: Government consultation on new regulations and further development of the supporting infrastructure to take effect from the fourth compliance period (1 January – 31 December

Washington state in the United States is considering legislation to regulate bisphenol A.

2009-03-01

Washington state is considering legislation to ban the manufacture, sale, and distribution of water bottles, children's water bottles, cups, and other containers containing bisphenol A (BPA), effective July 1, 2010. If passed, the ban would cover: BPA is used to manufacture epoxy resins and polycarbonate plastics, and is a major component of hard polycarbonate plastics. Polycarbonate plastics are used in various food and beverage packaging products, while epoxy resins are commonly used as a clear coating for metal products. BPA is also used in various children's products, such as toys, pacifiers, bottles, and teethers; however, due to increasing public concern, many manufacturers have voluntarily phased out the use of BPA in their products. Several U.S. states and cities have attempted to ban the use of BPA in children's products, but failed, including San Francisco and California. The Consumer Product Safety Enhancement Act prohibits the use of certain phthalates, but does not restrict BPA. At the federal level, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is reviewing data on all products regulated by the agency, including those known to contain bisphenol A (BPA). The Obama administration is expected to take a more proactive approach to the BPA issue, and future federal regulations on this chemical may become even stricter. – Reference source:

US electronics manufacturers are required to pay a minimum annual fee of $50,000 per year to recycle E-waste

2009-03-01

According to the manufacturer registration fee schedule published by NERIC (National Electronics Recycling Infrastructure Clearinghouse) (see table below), in 2009, manufacturers of electronic products subject to mandatory recycling in the United States were required to pay at least $50,000 annually in registration fees for nationwide product recycling, depending on the state. Several U.S. states have implemented mandatory electronic recycling programs, and the administrative costs of these programs are covered by registration fees levied on electronic product manufacturers. Maryland and West Virginia use these funds to subsidize local electronic waste collection and recycling, while other states typically use them to pay employee salaries, extend services, and for implementation. State Name | Manufacturer Registration Fee California | None Connecticut | To be determined Hawaii | $5,000 Illinois | $5,000 Maine | None Maryland | $5,000

The U.S. CPSC will provide manufacturers with guidelines for complying with CPSIA

2009-03-01

Chapter 108 of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) restricts the levels of phthalates in children's toys and child care products. Three phthalates (DEHP, DBP, and BBP) are permanently banned, and their permitted concentration in children's toys and child care products is 0.1%. The other three temporarily banned substances, DINP, DIDP, and DnOP, must not exceed 0.1% in "children's toys that can be put in a child's mouth" and "child care products." This ban took effect on February 10, 2009. Definitions such as "children's toys," "children's toys that can be put in a child's mouth," and "child care products" are detailed in Chapter 108. It is important to note that these definitions apply only to Chapter 108 of the CPSIA. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has received numerous inquiries from manufacturers potentially affected by the act; therefore, the Commission is currently developing guidelines for manufacturers to determine whether their products must comply with the requirements of the act. Currently, it is known that products already regulated by other federal agencies, such as food, cosmetics, and medical devices, generally do not fall under the category of "consumer products." However, items like baby pacifiers and cups are subject to the jurisdiction of both the CPSC and the FDA (Food and Drug Administration). The FDA regulates additives that are indirectly added to food, such as those that may be released from the container.

China accelerates action plan to promote energy-saving lamps

2009-03-01

To accelerate energy conservation and carbon reduction, gradually phase out incandescent lamps, and expedite the promotion of energy-saving lamps, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), in cooperation with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Global Environment Facility (GEF), has launched the "China's Phasing Out of Incandescent Lamps and Accelerating the Promotion of Energy-Saving Lamps" project, supporting the research and development of the "Action Plan for China's Phasing Out of Incandescent Lamps and Accelerating the Promotion of Energy-Saving Lamps." Currently, related research has begun. China is a major producer and consumer of lighting products. In 2007, China produced 4.44 billion incandescent lamps, accounting for one-third of the world's production, with 2.98 billion exported; and produced 3 billion compact fluorescent lamps, accounting for 80% of the world's production, with 2.2 billion exported. Lighting accounts for approximately 12% of China's total electricity consumption. Replacing incandescent lamps with energy-saving lamps can save 60% to 80% of electricity. If all existing incandescent lamps were replaced with energy-saving lamps, 48 ​​billion kilowatt-hours of electricity could be saved annually, representing a huge potential and an important way to achieve energy conservation and carbon reduction goals. – Reference source: Hong Kong Trade Development Council (HKTDC) 2009-02-01

The most environmentally friendly electronic products by Greenpeace

2009-03-01

Following its quarterly Guide to Greener Electronics, Greenpeace invited electronics manufacturers in 2008 to submit their most environmentally friendly products/models for evaluation, surveying the most environmentally friendly products on the market and publishing the results in December 2008. This survey, titled "Green Electronic…The search continues," included 15 participating manufacturers: Acer, Dell, Fujitsu Siemens, Hewlett Packard, Lenovo, LG Electronics, Motorola, Nokia, Panasonic, RIM/Blackberry, Sharp, Samsung, Sony, Sony Ericsson, and Toshiba. These 15 manufacturers submitted 50 products for Greenpeace to evaluate. The evaluation criteria were divided into four main categories: 1. Use of hazardous chemical substances: Hazardous substances included PVC, brominated flame retardants (BRFs), antimony, and phthalates.

Energy efficiency labeling for household induction cookers will be mandatory in China starting March 1st.

2009-03-01

Starting March 1, 2009, China will enforce the "Implementation Rules for Energy Efficiency Labeling of Household Induction Cookers," prohibiting the sale of induction cookers without energy efficiency labels. This will eliminate 10% to 15% of high-energy-consuming household induction cookers from the market. On September 1, 2008, the national standard "Energy Efficiency Limits and Energy Efficiency Grades for Household Induction Cookers" came into full effect, officially ending the long-standing lack of standards for the Chinese induction cooker industry. An official from the China Household Electrical Appliances Association stated that the publication of energy efficiency labels has promoted the positive development of the entire induction cooker industry, maximized consumer protection, and played a significant role in improving the international standing of Chinese product technical standards. According to relevant research, if the entire induction cooker industry can meet the energy-saving standards, based on the current annual sales volume of 50 million units, this is equivalent to saving the country more than 1.5 million tons of standard coal annually, greatly contributing to the construction of an energy-saving society. According to reports, the energy efficiency standard for induction cookers is divided into five levels, thus limiting the market entry threshold. Products with energy efficiency below level five will be phased out and will not be allowed to be produced or sold. Consumers will be able to easily select products by checking the label. Source: Jiangsu WTO-TBT Information Service Network 

Pay attention to FSC-controlled timber risk assessment to avoid economic losses in timber trade.

2009-02-12

Companies that have obtained FSC-mixed certification and use controlled timber will find that since the FSC organization implemented the FSC-STD-40-005 V2 standard (Company Assessment Standard for FSC Controlled Timber) on January 1, 2007, the requirements for controlling FSC-controlled timber have become increasingly detailed and stringent. Many companies feel that the new standard adds significantly more content than FSC-STD-40-005 V1 in implementing controlled timber management. Some companies even believe that controlling timber management is impossible for some domestic timber processors to fully implement, especially in the risk assessment stage. However, it is important to note that if a company purchases controlled timber but neglects certain requirements during the risk assessment process, the purchased materials may not be usable in the production of FSC-mixed products, or the produced products may not be able to be sold as FSC-certified products. The resulting economic losses could be substantial. Therefore, we should spend more time conducting risk assessments for controlled timber. FSC-controlled timber should avoid the following five sources: FSC-STD-40-005 V2 provides two methods for sourcing controlled timber. The first is to purchase raw materials from suppliers who have obtained FSC-controlled timber sales qualifications. The second is for the company to conduct its own FSC-controlled timber assessment process and purchase raw materials from non-certified suppliers. The first method is the simplest, but currently only two companies in China have obtained FSC certification.

IECQ Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

2008-12-24

1. Some companies believe that as long as a test report shows the content of heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, mercury, and hexavalent metals, it can be used to determine the RoHS compliance of materials. For example, some companies use test reports collected regarding the European EN71-3 toy safety standard to determine RoHS compliance. Is this acceptable? Answer: No. EN71-3-9 specifies the "leaching amount" under certain environmental conditions, while RoHS specifies the "content" of materials. The sample preparation methods for the two tests are different, and the results may differ greatly. Test data cannot be substituted for each other. 2. The purchased parts contain multiple colors, but the test report only shows the content of hazardous substances in one color. Can such a report be used to determine the RoHS compliance of materials? Answer: No. 3. When there is only a test result for a single homogeneous material in an assembly, can it be used to determine the RoHS compliance of the entire assembly? Answer: No. It can only prove that this one product is compliant. 4. For processes that may involve contamination, switching cleaning methods are usually used to prevent cross-contamination, but their effectiveness is difficult to verify. What are some reference suggestions (or experiences) for practice? A: The cleaning and verification methods should be determined based on the level of pollution risk. Evidence of cleaning capability can be considered from several aspects: 5. For factories that have completed RoHS switching, all products need to meet RoHS requirements. In this case, is labeling a key control item? A: 6. How to verify the materials provided by the supplier?

IECQ QC 080000 Standard Interpretation Part 3

2008-12-24

7.1 Planning of Hazardous Substance Reduction Processes and Product Realization The requirements of ISO 9001 shall be used in conjunction with the following requirements. The organization shall plan and develop processes for the realization of hazardous substances-reduced products. In planning the realization of hazardous substances-reduced products, the organization shall, where appropriate, determine the following: a) Quality objectives and requirements for the hazardous substances-reduced product; b) The need to establish hazardous substances reduction processes, documentation, and resources for the hazardous substances-reduced product; c) The verification, validation, monitoring, inspection, and testing activities required for the hazardous substances-reduced product, and the acceptance criteria for the product. Where appropriate, information service providers shall be included; d) Procedure documents or work instructions for processes using restricted substances, so as to include preventative measures in the presence of contamination; e) Evidence required to demonstrate that the hazardous substances reduction realization process and the resulting product meet the requirements; f) The output of the hazardous substances reduction planning shall be in a form suitable to the organization's operating methods. Note 1: Documents used to determine the hazardous substances reduction process (including product realization process) and resources for a product may be called a quality plan. c. On-site audits; d. Random spot checks (the frequency and sampling plan are determined based on risk analysis); e. Management of samples sent by customers. Product realization refers to all processes involved in creating a product. Essentially, it's the process from customer needs to mass production of a product. This differs from product design and development, which involves translating regulatory, technical, safety, functional, market, or other product requirements into technical specifications.

REACH’s impact on traders and their responses

2008-12-24

The "European Union Regulations on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals" (REACH) is called "the most complex foreign technical barrier with the widest impact that China has ever encountered". The scope and extent of its impact can be imagined Know. The impact of REACH on different manufacturing industries can be easily found in various media and professional journals, which is very helpful for manufacturing companies. So, does REACH only affect product manufacturers? Does REACH have any direct requirements for dealers who export to the EU? Will it have an impact? What are the impacts? What needs to be done to ensure normal trade? These will be the main focus of this article, and they are also issues that European dealers must pay attention to. 1. Distributors and export trade categories The REACH regulations clearly define "distributors", which refer to natural or legal persons in the EU who only store substances or place substances on the market for third parties, including retailers. Distributors within the scope of this definition obviously refer to companies established in the EU that are engaged in product storage or sales. Domestic distributors do not fall into the category of EU distributors. The dealers considered in this article are enterprises that only engage in import and export trade and do not produce themselves, especially those that export to the EU. If a dealer is producing at the same time, he is actually a "non-EU manufacturer" within the scope of REACH, and the terms of "non-EU manufacturer" apply, which is beyond the scope of this article. Judging from the registered address and scope of operations, distribution

« Previous page 頁面1 ... 頁面33 頁面34 頁面35 頁面36 頁面37 Next Page »
Line

Lion Technology Industrial Co., Ltd.

  • Phone: +886-2-26793552
  • FAX: +886-2-26794698
  • Email: Service@Li-On.Biz
  • Head Office/Factory Address: No. 161, Jianshan Road, Yingge District, New Taipei City 23942
  • No. 161, Jianshan Rd., Yingge Dist., New Taipei City
    23942, Taiwan (ROC)​

Welcome! You are the Free Tools visitors

© 2026 LION Green Design Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved