News

News

Latest Articles

Search results: 1707 articles

The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has officially announced 15 substances of very high concern, NO. 39/2008.

The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) officially announced 15 Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs) No. 39/2008. The ECHA Member Country Committee met in Helsinki, Finland on October 7 and 8, 2008, and, in accordance with the Committee's resolution, announced 15 SVHCs requiring authorization on its official website. The 15 SVHCs include: Anthracene, Di(tributyltin) oxide, 4,4-diaminodiphenylmethane, Cobalt chloride, Dibutyl phthalate (DBP), Arsenic pentoxide, Toluyl butyl phthalate (BBP), Arsenic trioxide, Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), Triethylarsenate, Xylene musk, Lead hydrogen arsenate, Hexabromocyclododecane, Sodium dichromate dihydrate anthracene, and Short-chain chlorinated paraffins (C10-13). The SVHC candidate list was submitted in July 2008 by seven Member States in accordance with Annex XV of the REACH Directive, recommending 16 chemical substances. It was published for public comment in July and August 2008. Based on the opinions of stakeholders and Member States, the Member States Committee unanimously confirmed at its meeting that, except for Triethylarsenate, which had already been unanimously approved as a Substance of Very High Concern during the publication and comment phase, the other 14 chemical substances were also listed as Substances of Very High Concern requiring authorization. Previously listed...

EU REACH: Latest Developments NO.40/2008

EU REACH: Latest Updates NO.40/2008 Producers and importers of finished products in the EU and the European Economic Area are obligated to notify the European Chemicals Agency (ECA) if their finished products contain any substance on the candidate list of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs) under the REACH Directive at a concentration exceeding 0.1% and exceeding one tonne (per company per year in the produced or imported finished products). The notification deadlines are as follows: For SVHCs announced before December 1, 2010, the notification date must be no later than June 1, 2011. For SVHCs included on or after December 1, 2010, the notification date must be no later than six months after the substance's inclusion. Latest Announcement: REACH FAQ Version 2.3 – Announced on November 6, 2008. This version adds six new questions related to registration. Please visit http://echa.europa.eu/reach/faq_en.asp. Draft Guidance on Annex V and Waste – The European Commission has completed and published a draft guidance on Annex V, waste, and recyclable materials. These documents have been submitted to the European Chemicals Agency for future cooperation and development with Member States and stakeholders. Furthermore, hazardous substances listed in Annex 17 of the REACH Regulation will come into effect on 1 June 2009. The Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) provisions are outlined in Article 33 of the REACH Regulation.

Greenpeace releases the tenth edition of "Guide to Greener Electronics" NO.42/2008

Greenpeace released the 10th edition of "Guide to Greener Electronics" NO.42/2008. Since the first edition of the Guide to Greener Electronics in August 2006, Greenpeace has updated the assessment every three months. The latest 10th edition was released on November 24, 2008, assessing 18 world-renowned manufacturers, covering products such as computers, mobile phones, televisions, and game consoles. Assessment Focus: This assessment continues the focus of the eighth edition, evaluating each manufacturer based on 15 criteria, including: Whether specific hazardous substances are used in products; SVHCs included on or after December 1, 2010, with notification no later than six months after the substance's inclusion; and improvements to corporate policies and practices related to climate and energy. Ranking: Nokia retained its first place with a score of 6.9, followed by Sony Ericsson, Toshiba, and Samsung tied for second place, with Fujitsu Siemens and LGE close behind. Motorola, Microsoft, Dell, and Apple have not set any targets or timelines for reducing global warming pollution and carbon dioxide emissions. Only Fujitsu, Philips, and Sharp support a target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 30% by 2020; HP and Philips have made a more explicit commitment to reduce emissions in [specific areas].

U.S. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act No. 41/2008

On August 14, 2008, US President George W. Bush signed the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA). This act authorized and expanded the powers of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to prevent unsafe products from entering the United States, addressing shortcomings in existing US consumer product safety laws. Key provisions of the CPSIA include: banning the sale of any product intended for children 12 years or younger that contains more lead than permitted; and implementing phased limits on lead content. The lead content limit was set at 600 ppm starting February 10, 2009; the second phase, starting August 14, 2009, allowed a limit of 300 ppm; and three years later, on August 14, 2011, the allowed limit was further reduced to 100 ppm. The lead content limit for paints on furniture, toys, and other children's products was lowered from 0.06% to 0.009% by weight, effective August 14, 2009. Permanent restrictions have been imposed on bis-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), and butylparaben (BBP). Transitional restrictions have been imposed on diisononyl phthalate (DINP), diisodecyl phthalate (DIDP), and di-n-octyl phthalate (DNOP) until the Chronic Hazards Advisory Group (CHAP) reviews these three phthalates.

IEC 62321 Ed.1 is about to be officially released.

IEC 62321 Ed.1 is about to be officially released as NO.37/2008. The final draft international standard NO.111/116/FDIS, after a two-month voting period (August 1, 2008 to October 3, 2008), saw its results published on its official website on October 14, 2008. The voting objective of 111/116/FDIS was whether to approve the release of the final draft international standard (FDIS) as an international standard. The voting results are summarized as follows: Passing Criteria Result Votes from P-members: 25 For P-members: 25 = 100% >= 67% Pass Total Votes: 29 Total Votes Against: 0 = 0% <= 25% Pass Final Decision Pass All votes were in favor except for Greece, Israel, Poland, and Portugal, who abstained. The vote resulted in approval of the final draft of the international standard, IEC 62321 Ed.1, as an international standard. The standard is about to be officially released, but the publication date is yet to be determined. SGS will closely monitor the latest developments. For any questions, please feel free to contact our customer service team by letter or phone. SGS is a member of the IEC Restricted Substances Testing Task Force (IEC/TC 111 WG3), and in addition to passing [the relevant regulations/procedures], [the relevant regulations/procedures]...

Announcement on the Development Procedure of China RoHS Management Catalog

Announcement No. 38/2008 of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China, "Procedures for Formulating the Key Management Catalogue for Pollution Control of Electronic Information Products," consists of sixteen articles. The purpose is to objectively, fairly, and impartially formulate the key management catalogue for pollution control of electronic information products, prohibiting or restricting the use of toxic and hazardous substances in electronic information products through catalogue management. Article 5 lists the principles to be followed in determining whether a product should be included in the key management catalogue: (i) Products and materials with large production volumes and wide applications, whose toxic and hazardous substances pose a significant threat and damage to the environment and human health; (ii) Products containing toxic and hazardous substances for which there are no technical obstacles to replacement with non-toxic, harmless, or low-toxic and low-harm substances, and which are economically feasible; (iii) Products for which, although toxic and hazardous substances cannot be replaced, can meet the limits of toxic and hazardous substances, and whose production is technically feasible and economically feasible; (iv) Products explicitly restricted due to severe pollution under international conventions; (v) Other products that should be included in the key management catalogue. Other key points to note in the announcement include: The Key Management Catalogue for Pollution Control of Electronic Information Products consists of the product names of electronic information products, the types of toxic and hazardous substances restricted from use, and their usage periods. It is adjusted annually based on actual conditions and the requirements of scientific and technological development, and is gradually expanded in batches.

EU REACH: Latest Updates on the SVHC Candidate List No. 35/2008

EU REACH: Latest Updates on the SVHC Candidate List No. 35/2008. Geert Dancet, CEO of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), provided an update on the authorization process at the Substitution Conference in Brussels on September 17th, and also explained the progress of the previously released REACH List of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs). Mr. Dancet explained that if the progress is as expected, the 16 SVHCs recently announced will be voted on in October. Four substances on the initial list are considered controversial, and their inclusion in the SVHC list will be discussed at the fourth meeting of the Member States Committee (MSC) in October. Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) (primarily from industry) Anthracene (primarily from industry) Cyclododecane (one member state and industry do not support this nomination) Musk xylene (primarily from industry) What are Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs)? According to the EU's New Chemicals Regulation (REACH), SVHCs listed in Annex XIV are those that meet the criteria of Category 1 or 2 as listed in Directive 67/548/EEC and are carcinogenic, mutagenic, or reproductively toxic. (Carcinog)

EU Hazardous Substances Directive, 30th Revision No. 36/2008

The 30th Amendment to the EU Hazardous Substances Directive, NO. 36/2008, was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on September 15, 2008. The Commission announced Directive 2008/58/EC, decided on August 21, 2008, and it entered into force on October 5, 2008. This was the 30th amendment to Directive 67/548/EEC, and all EU Member States were required to transpose it into their national law by June 1, 2009. The amendment to Directive 2008/58/EC revised the regulations on the classification, packaging, and labelling of hazardous substances in Directive 67/548/EEC, due to the need to update the classification and labelling information for some new substances or existing substances. This Appendix I list of substances includes over 800 chemical substances (nearly 290 of which are CMRs (carcinogenic, mutagenic, or toxic for reproduction) and are carcinogenic, mutagenic, or toxic for reproduction). 380 new substances have been added. The classification and labeling of 516 substances have been modified. Three substances have been deleted. Note 6 and related materials in Appendix I have been removed. Key revisions include: For example, benzene has been classified as a mutagen. Therefore, all substances containing benzene should be separately classified. The primary cause of allergies to people caused by nickel alloy products is the amount of nickel released, not the nickel content of the alloy.

Greenpeace releases the ninth edition of its "Guide to Greener Electronics" NO.34/2008

Greenpeace released the ninth edition of its "Guide to Greener Electronics" (NO. 34/2008). Since the first edition of the "Guide to Greener Electronics" in August 2006, Greenpeace has updated the assessment every three months. The latest ninth edition, released on September 16, 2008, assessed 18 world-renowned manufacturers, covering products such as computers, mobile phones, televisions, and game consoles. Assessment Focus: This assessment continues the focus of the eighth edition, evaluating each manufacturer based on 15 criteria, including: Rectifying products by removing hazardous substances; Responsibly retrieving/recycling waste products; Improving corporate policies and practices related to climate and energy. For detailed assessment highlights, please refer to SGS's 2008 issue No. 25 of the electronic newsletter, published by Greenpeace as the eighth edition of the "Guide to Greener Electronics". Ranking of Top 5 (Ninth Edition vs. Eighth Edition): 1. Nokia, Sony, Ericsson & Sony; 2. Samsung; 3. Fujitsu, Siemens, Nokia; 4. Sony, Ericsson, Samsung & Dell; 5. Sony. (Note: The overall score differs slightly from the eighth edition due to a shift in evaluation focus.)

Draft Guidelines for Risk Assessment of Non-Food Consumer Products - Public Consultation No. 32/2008

From July 15, 2008, the European Union launched a public consultation on the draft of the Risk Assessment Guidelines for non-food consumer products. The consultation was open to competent authorities of Member States and interested parties. The consultation period lasted three months, from July 15, 2008 to October 15, 2008. The purpose of the consultation was to address the risk assessment of market research authorities in Member States dealing with non-food consumer products under the framework of Product Safety Directive 2001/95/EC. The aim was to establish the RAPEX system to prevent or restrict products that pose serious risks to consumer health and safety. The guidelines covered the following three steps: Online consultation: The online materials were only available in English. Consultants could download the draft of the Risk Assessment Guidelines for non-food consumer products to read and understand its details. There was a 90-minute time limit for submitting responses to the online consultation. Responses not submitted within the time limit would not be recorded. Therefore, consultants were advised to download and complete the questionnaire beforehand to facilitate the consultation process. It has not yet been decided whether to publish the client's submission along with the compiled consultation results. Clients are required to respond to this decision. SGS will closely monitor the latest developments. For any questions, please feel free to contact our customer service department by letter or phone.

EU revises ELV (Extinction of Vehicles Directive) exclusion items NO.33/2008

The European Commission published Directive 2008/689/EC, decided on August 1, 2008, in the Official Journal of the European Union on August 23, 2008. This directive amends Annex II to the ELV (End-of-Life Vehicles) Directive 2000/53/EC. This annex contains the exclusion list for Article 4(2)(a) of the ELV Directive, and this amendment entered into force on August 26, 2008. The amendments were made in response to technological advancements. Since 2002, the European Commission has made five amendments to Annex II. The most recent was in September 2005 (2005/673/EC), which mainly discussed expiring exclusion items to determine whether they should be extended. The criteria for this amendment are as follows: Most exclusion items expired in July 2008. For heavy metals whose use can be avoided or have alternatives due to technological advancements, the exclusion period will not be extended. Heavy metals that cannot be avoided or for which there are still no alternatives will remain excluded. The European Commission will periodically review these exclusions, allowing sufficient time for their future elimination. Directive 2005/438/EC permits the installation of parts from vehicles marketed after July 1, 2003, into vehicles marketed before July 1, 2003 (i.e., for safety reasons, vehicles marketed before July 1, 2003, can only be repaired using original parts (i.e., parts containing heavy metals)). In this specific case, parts that do not meet the above exclusion criteria may still be used.

Canada approves ban on perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) NO.28/2008

Canada Approves Ban on Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) NO.28/2008 The Government of Canada recently approved Environment Canada's proposed regulation, issued on January 9, 2007, banning the use of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), its salts, and its derivatives in consumer products. This regulation requires a ban, effective May 29, 2008, on the manufacture, use, sale, supply, importation, and manufacture of products containing PFOS. This regulation is based on subsection 93(1) of section 319 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act 1999 (CEPA 1999), aimed at preventing environmental harm caused by the use of the following substances. Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its salts, including compounds containing the C8F17SO2, C8F17SO3, or C8F17SO2N groups. In Europe, the European Parliament voted in 2007 to adopt amendment 2006/122/EC to the EU Dangerous Substances Directive (76/769/EEC), strictly restricting the market entry and use of PFOS and related substances. Member States were required to transpose the directive into their national law by 27 December 2007 and to convene an agreement on June 27, 2008.

RoHS launches consultation on new exclusionary items NO.31/2008

Consultation for new RoHS exclusionary items launched NO.31/2008 The consultation for new RoHS exclusionary items, which has already been conducted twice by stakeholder public consultations, has recently launched the consultation for the fifth application for new RoHS exclusionary items. . No. Issue submitter 5 Lead content in solder used to connect enameled wires (plating <100μm) and copper-clad aluminum wires (copper layer less than 20μm) PSS Belgium NV According to Article 5(2) of the RoHS Directive 2002/95/EC, The EU Executive Commission is required to consult with stakeholders before revising the content of the exclusion items in the appendix. The results of the consultation will be forwarded to the RoHS Technical Adaptation Committee (TAC), and the Executive Committee needs to provide a channel for collecting information. Based on Article 5(1)(b) of the RoHS Directive, the EU Executive Commission recently received an application for a RoHS exclusion project from the industry. Therefore, Öko-Institut and Fraunhofer IZM have joined forces on behalf of the EU Executive Commission to launch a third public stakeholder consultation on possible amendments to the RoHS Annex. Submitters of amendment requests are solely responsible for their wording and the evidence they provide. In addition, the role of the Öko-Institut and Fraunhofer IZM is to collect and evaluate

Massive ice shelf collapses in the Canadian Arctic

Scientists said today that a 55-square-kilometer ice shelf collapsed in the Canadian Arctic last month, and the remaining ice shelves are shrinking at a "massive and worrying" rate. They stated that the Markham Ice Shelf broke off from Ellesmere Island in early August. They also said that two large ice shelves, totaling 76 square kilometers, have broken off from the nearby Serson Ice Shelf. "These changes are large in scale and worrying," said Warwick Vincent, director of the Northern Research Centre at Laval University in Quebec. Temperatures in much of the Arctic have risen much faster than the global average in recent decades, a phenomenon experts believe is linked to global warming. Source: Massive Ice Shelf Collapse in the Canadian Arctic | Environmental Information Centre

Global warming and rising sea temperatures will make storms more powerful.

According to a study published today, global warming may be increasing the power of the most intense tropical cyclones. The study states that for every degree Celsius increase in sea surface temperature in cyclone-forming tropical regions, the number of the most powerful storms could increase by nearly a third. The authors of the study, in a report published in the British journal *Nature*, said, "As ocean temperatures warm, the ocean has more energy to generate the strong winds of tropical cyclones." Previous studies based on observations over the past thirty years have found that hurricanes are becoming more powerful due to ocean warming. However, observational data for the Atlantic region is more detailed and has a longer history than observations of cyclones in the Indian Ocean and typhoons in the Pacific. To fill this gap, three American scientists studied satellite data from all storm-forming ocean areas from 1981 to 2006. They calculated the number of storms and the maximum wind speeds during each storm, comparing them to sea surface temperatures. Over these twenty-five years, the researchers did not find an overall increase in the number of storms. However, wind speeds increased significantly in the most powerful storms, or those roughly classified as the highest intensity. Aside from the South Pacific, almost all storm-forming ocean regions exhibit this trend: the more intense the cyclone, the greater the temperature variation. This is clearly because the South Pacific is already the warmest ocean region, thus its temperature increase is relatively lower compared to the Atlantic, Indian, and North Pacific. Researchers did not observe an increase in wind speed in less intense storms. This study, conducted by a research team led by Elsner at Florida State University, demonstrates this trend.

The review of RoHS exclusion clauses will begin in January next year.

The review of RoHS exclusion clauses will begin in January next year. Article 5, Paragraph 1 (C) of the RoHS Directive stipulates that the exclusions in the appendix shall be reviewed at least every four years, or after new items are added. Four years to review it. Oko-Institut Consultants was selected to manage the RoHS Directive review process and make recommendations. Oko-Institut also has a specially designed website so that the public can access the latest inspection news at any time. The URL of this website is: http://rohs.exemptions.oeko.info/ The first RoHS Directive stakeholder consultation meeting is expected to be held in January 2008, during which the current 29 exclusion clauses and 3 new proposals will be re-examined. Proposal for exclusion clauses. This stakeholder consultation meeting will last eight weeks. In addition to the six restricted substances restricted by RoHS, the EU is also considering adding other hazardous substances and deciding which of RoHS and REACH can most effectively manage hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. Oko-Institut Consulting Company has also started to identify chemical substances that have not yet been classified as "hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment". The items currently included in the exclusion clauses do not mean that they will never be exempted from legal control. Therefore, it is recommended that manufacturers still pay close attention to the development and trends of future exclusion clauses. – Reference information

Greenpeace releases sixth quarter environmentally friendly electronics company evaluation

On November 27, 2007, Greenpeace released its sixth quarterly Guide to Greener Electronics. This year's assessment included television manufacturers and rapidly growing portable game console companies for the first time. The results showed that Nintendo was the least environmentally friendly electronics company, followed by Philips and Microsoft, which ranked second to last and third to last, respectively. Sony Ericsson and Samsung both received a high score of 7.7 out of 10, tying for the title of "most environmentally friendly electronics company" globally. Greenpeace has been publishing this assessment report since August of last year, updating it quarterly. This was the sixth report, and the biggest difference was the addition of four companies to the assessment, bringing the total number of companies to 18 from 14. The scoring criteria included nine items such as the presence of toxic chemicals in the products and the recycling of old products, with a maximum score of 10. Nintendo, home to the wildly popular Wii video game, enjoys strong sales, but has also been labeled one of the least environmentally friendly electronics companies. Green organizations point out that Nintendo has yet to provide a timeline for phasing out toxic substances like PVC and brominated flame retardants from its products, and its recycling rates for old products are very low, resulting in Nintendo receiving zero points in this survey.

UNU report says EU e-waste recycling rate needs to be strengthened

A report published by an association led by the United Nations University (UNU) indicates that the European Union's e-waste recycling rate is far from its target. The report calls for increased e-waste recycling rates to not only protect the environment but also benefit the electronics industry itself. The report points out that currently only 25% of medium-sized appliances and 40% of large appliances in Europe are recycled or reused, while the recycling rate for small appliances is almost zero. Ruediger Kuehr of the UNU's Bonn office in Germany criticized, "This means there is still a lot of room for improvement." Kuehr called for a long-term target of 60% for the recycling rate of small electronic products such as MP3 players, as well as medium-sized audio equipment, microwave ovens, and televisions. For large appliances such as refrigerators and washing machines, the recycling rate should even reach 75%. This would allow for the recycling of 5.3 million metric tons of e-waste by 2011, double the original target of 220 million metric tons. While the growth rate of e-waste is not rapid, it maintains an annual growth rate of 2.5% to 2.7%. A UNU report estimates that by 2020, the total amount of e-waste in EU countries will reach 12.3 million metric tons, accounting for one-third of the global e-waste volume. Although the EU's WEEE directive requires a recycling rate of 4 kg of e-waste per person per year, recycling rates vary significantly among EU member states.

Experts from BASF in Germany answer questions about REACH from the Taiwanese industry

At the REACH International Symposium held in Taiwan on November 9th this year, Dr. Renate Becker-Arnold of BASF (Germany) provided detailed answers to common questions from the Taiwanese industry regarding REACH. The answers in the Q&A set (please refer to the attachment) represent only Dr. Renate Becker-Arnold's interpretation of the issues and do not represent the EU or have any legal effect. – Reference source: ITRI/BASF Dr. Renate Becker-Arnold 2007-12-21 Other related files download: 20071109_ITRI_TW_Question and Answers.pdf

The European Commission publishes product safety assessment report

The European Commission published a consumer product safety assessment report on November 22nd of this year, noting significant progress made by mainland China in addressing toy safety issues. The report outlines a series of recommendations to address deficiencies in the existing consumer product safety mechanism. The Commission's assessment focuses on the roles of all participants in the supply chain, member state authorities, and international cooperation in ensuring that unsafe products are not sold in the EU market. The Commission also reviewed EU product safety law, covering multiple policy areas (industry, trade, taxation, environment, and foreign relations) to identify any loopholes. The assessment report proposes several measures in four main areas, primarily concerning the implementation and enforcement of existing product safety regulations. Enforcement: The assessment report found that the current EU legislative framework provides adequate protection for consumers, but the relevant legislation needs to be effectively enforced. Industry Operators: The assessment report emphasizes that, according to Directive 2001/95/EC on general product safety, manufacturers and importers are responsible for ensuring that products sold on the market are safe and harmless. Therefore, businesses must develop inspection procedures to ensure that product design and manufacturing processes meet safety standards, and to assess finished products. The report stipulates that importers and retailers must obtain guarantees from suppliers proving the safety of products to be sold on the market. The report proposes several new measures for operators, including: Member State Regulatory Authorities. The European Commission has indicated it will cooperate with Member State regulatory authorities.

error: Content protected