News

News

Latest Articles

Search results: 1707 articles

The Korean government speeds up the implementation of Korea RoHS

The South Korean government accelerated the implementation of the Korean RoHS. Following the passage of the Act on the Recycling of Electrical and Electronic Equipment and Vehicles (hereinafter referred to as Korean RoHS), the Enforcement Ordinance, and the Enforcement Regulation at the end of 2007, the South Korean government accelerated the development of its implementation methods. By the end of January 2008, the Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy had announced five implementation methods, as well as legally binding and mandatory requirements compliant with Korean RoHS. The electronic framework for the Eco-assurance System, which manages electrical and electronic equipment and vehicles, has also begun operation. The full name of this system is Electrical and Electronic Equipment and Vehicle Eco-Assurance System. Timeline for the development of Korean RoHS regulations and implementation methods: # April 27, 2007 Act on the Recycling of Electrical and Electronic Equipment and Vehicles (hereinafter referred to as Korean RoHS)

The European Science Committee comments on the environmental risk assessment report of tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA)

On January 15, 2008, the European Commission's Scientific Committee on Health and the Environment (SCHER) (1) issued a comment based on the environmental impact results of the June 2007 risk assessment report for tetrabromobisphenol A (2). SCHER believes that "overall, tetrabromobisphenol A has excellent performance (good quality)." In principle, SCHER agrees with the conclusions made in the Risk Assessment Report (RAR). For example, tetrabromobisphenol A used in reactive form in epoxy resins for printed circuit boards does not pose significant risks to the environment. However, specific plastics (ABS) that use tetrabromobisphenol A in an additive form have been confirmed to cause risks to soil, sediment and water during the production process. Therefore, the European Union adopts the Risk Reduction Strategy (RRS) to reduce the use of tetrabromobisphenol A in the industry to reduce this risk without restricting the trade and use of tetrabromobisphenol A. SCHER suggested the conclusion that (i) tetrabromobisphenol A may decompose into bisphenol A. This also reaffirms RAR's conclusion that "no risks have been identified at this stage." The EU Executive Commission will refer to SCHER's recommendations, together with the completed RAR and RRS, and publish the final recommendations for tetrabromobisphenol A in the official journal.

California takes the lead in restricting phthalates in toys and child care products

In early 2007, San Francisco proposed law amendment No. 120-06, reiterating that toys, child care and child feeding products are prohibited from containing phthalates (Phthalates); on October 14, 2007, the California Governor passed AB 1108. . Starting from January 1, 2009, this bill will restrict the manufacture and sale of certain toys and child care products to not exceed the limits of six phthalate compounds. Phthalates are chemicals used to increase the plasticity of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic products and to add fragrance to cosmetics. They can be used in many products used by children, such as teethers, toys, and soft plastic books. In California, four compounds, including DEHP, DBP, BBP, and DIDP, are chemicals known to cause cancer or produce toxicity. Toy means "all products designed or intended by the manufacturer to be used by children for fun." Child care articles are "any products that help children sleep, relax, maintain hygiene, feed children, or allow children to suck, including pacifiers of various shapes and types." The six phthalate items restricted by the California AB 1108 bill are exactly the same as those stipulated in the EU Directive 2005/84/EC. The comparison is shown in the following table: Phthalates California AB 1108 Bill EU Directive 2005/84/ EC Restricted Product Limits Restricted Product Limits D

How to enter the EU for vehicle electronic and electrical products

E mark European Economic Community's technical requirements for vehicle parts and implements ECE R10.02 test regulations. e mark The European Union's technical requirements for complete vehicles and components implement the 2006/28/EC test directive, including interference and anti-interference testing. 2006/28/EC DOC (i.e. CE DoC) For equipment with non-"immunity-related functions", you can perform e-mark directive-related tests in laboratories audited by ISO 17025, and prove compliance with the electromagnetic compatibility directive after testing After passing the R&TTE Radio Frequency and Communication Terminal Equipment Directive, Type Approval is not required. You can directly apply the CE mark and enter the EU market through self-declaration.

South Korea RoHS Act – Enforcement Measures Issued in December 2007

Announcement of the Korean RoHS Act ★ Law: The Enforcement Ordinance of the Act on the Recycling of Electrical and Electronic Equipment and Vehicles – 2007/12/28 ★ Regulation: The Enforcement Regulation of the Act on the Recycling of Electrical and Electronic Equipment and Vehicles – 2007/12/31 The main provisions of the law will take effect on July 1, 2008. Products marketed after July 1, 2008 will be subject to this law. Products marketed between January 1, 2008 and July 1, 2008 must comply with this law from January 1, 2011. The law requires (The Enforcement Ordinance of the Act) a. Control of the use of hazardous substances in products b. Concentration limits for hazardous substances c. Establishment of annual recycling rates d. Declaration of compliance with concentration limits for hazardous substances e. Provision of recycling information f. Mandatory regulations for electrical and electronic equipment

In 2008, the EU will implement the ROHS directive more strictly. Domestic manufacturers must not take it lightly.

Are you still taking chances? Perhaps you don’t know that EU countries have launched investigations into products on the market that comply with the RoHS directive. In the past, some people in the industry still believed that the RoHS directive would never be implemented. So far, the UK has launched more than 200 product investigations. In September this year, the first case of prosecution for violating the ROHS directive occurred in the UK. It is understood that Denmark is cooperating with three other Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden and Finland) to launch monitoring operations on 25 types of consumer products (IT, telecommunications, audio and toys), and the results will be released in December 2007. Belgium has also conducted on-site XRF screening of 88 electronic products on the market. The RoHS (2002/95/EC) directive aims to harmonize the laws of EU member states restricting the use of hazardous substances in electronic and electrical equipment, protect human health, and promote the recycling and processing of waste electronic and electrical equipment in an environmentally friendly manner. Require. In fact, EU countries have formed a RoHS Network to communicate with each other and share experiences regarding the implementation of the RoHS Directive. The current chairman of the RoHS Network is the British representative. Common enforcement practices in various countries include document review, customs inspection when goods enter the customs, purchase or seizure on the market, and even cross-border transfers, etc. At present, most EU countries have experience in inspecting low-concentration heavy metals in the packaging materials directive, but they have less experience with more complex electronic and electrical equipment. Therefore, the recent market product testing and survey activities are like testing the responsibilities of various countries.

Asia’s economic and social development will regress due to climate warming

The "Up In Smoke" coalition, comprised of approximately twenty major international environmental and development organizations, warned in a statement yesterday that unless immediate countermeasures and actions are taken to address the threats posed by climate change to humanity and the environment, global warming will set back the social and economic development of the entire Asian region by decades. The "Up In Smoke" coalition, comprised of international non-profit organizations such as ActionAid, the London-based International Institute for Environmental Development, and Greenpeace, made the above statement at a press conference in New Delhi yesterday. The statement cited the coalition's report, "Up In Smoke: Asia Pacific," which said that the impacts of climate change are already beginning to appear in several parts of Asia; for example, last month, a typhoon struck the southeastern coast of mainland China, affecting five million people. According to a report cited by the "Nothing to Be Gone" alliance, established four years ago, Asia, home to more than two-thirds of the world's population, will be the first to suffer the devastating consequences of climate change. More than half of Asia's population lives in coastal areas and will be direct victims of rising sea levels caused by global warming. Many Pacific island nations, such as Vanuatu, are already in crisis. The alliance report states that 87 percent of the world's 400 million known small villages are located in Asia, and these villages, relying on regular and reliable rainfall, are particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change. For example, increased drought in northern China is destroying the livelihoods of local farmers; furthermore, ten high-altitude glaciers in western China...

Climate change may harm Asia-Pacific the most

Thirty-five environmental and humanitarian aid groups released a research report on the 19th titled "Will the Asia-Pacific Region Be Destroyed?", warning that if countries worldwide do not pay attention to climate change, the Asia-Pacific region will be the hardest hit, and decades of economic and social development could be wiped out. The report points out that increasing research shows that temperatures in Asia will continue to rise this century, with negative consequences including more unpredictable rainfall and monsoons, severely impacting crop yields, stronger typhoons and tropical storms, and rising sea levels threatening the survival of Pacific island nations. Small farms will be hit hardest. The study found that Asia accounts for 87% of the world's 400 million small farms, and these small-scale agricultural operations are most affected by climate change; if nighttime temperatures rise by one degree Celsius during the harvest season, Asian rice production will decrease by 10%, and wheat production will decrease by 32% by 2050. Furthermore, the boom in biomass energy crops will accelerate deforestation, exacerbating global warming. Floods and droughts are causing crop losses. By country, island nations like Vanuatu, Kiribati, and Tuvalu are already threatened by rising sea levels, and the four billion people along Asia's coast may also be affected. Bangladesh, where 70% of the population is agricultural, is already impacted by changes in temperature and rainfall patterns, affecting crop yields. India faces both devastating floods and drought in some areas; "if left unchecked, India will lose 30% of its food production." China, threatened by drought and other factors, may see a 37% reduction in major crop yields by the end of this century. The report calls on developed countries to take steps to reduce...

The latest on U.S. state regulation of e-waste

Since this year, many states in the United States have greatly strengthened their supervision of electronic waste. Among them, Connecticut, Minnesota, North Carolina, Oregon and Texas have all passed similar electronic waste management regulations. Previously, eight states including Arkansas, California, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Washington State had implemented relevant regulations. In the medium term, more states will legislate to regulate e-waste. As more and more states formulate their own e-waste laws, the United States needs to formulate federal laws in this regard, or implement uniform national standards through various relevant parties. A brief summary of the electronic waste laws passed by many states in the United States is as follows: Minnesota (MINNESOTA) Starting from September 1, 2007, all new video display equipment must bear a clear and permanent manufacturer's trademark, and the manufacturer must also Participate in the annual registration program run by state government authorities, otherwise the equipment may not be sold to retailers. Starting September 1, 2008, manufacturers must submit annual reports to state authorities showing the retail sales of video equipment containing hazardous substances that exceed EU standards. Video display equipment refers to televisions and computer monitors sold to households, including laptop computers, with screens exceeding 9 inches diagonally. Connecticut (CONNECTICUT) Starting from January 1, 2008, all regulated electronic equipment must bear a clear and permanent manufacturer's trademark, and manufacturers must also participate in the annual registration program implemented by state government authorities.

EU Energy Using Products (EuP) Directive

The EU Energy Using Products (EuP) Directive was officially published in 2005, and the development of related supporting tools and standards has been underway. The EU aims to improve the energy efficiency and environmental performance of energy-using products by regulating their eco-design requirements. EuP broadly refers to all products that use energy to perform their functions, including electricity, solid, liquid, and gaseous energy sources (excluding vehicles). Currently, based on the importance and impact of products, the EU has identified 19 (14 + 5) categories of products for priority regulation, including personal computers/monitors, consumer electronics (such as televisions), batteries/power supplies, etc., and is conducting preliminary research. In the future, products must meet the eco-design requirements of their applicable implementation methods and obtain CE marking to circulate freely in the EU market.

EU strategy to control dioxin a major achievement

According to the new progress report of the European Commission, the EU officially adopted a specification for persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in 2004, which can be regarded as a major achievement, especially after a long period of controversy; its specification is mainly: Reduce the content of harmful substances such as Dioxins, Furans and PCBs. Each country must publish a product catalog and improvement plan, which are the basic tools for the 2004 POPs specification (EED 07/06/04) to require minimum releases of dioxin, furans and polychlorinated biphenyls. Some Member States have already adopted this improvement plan, while others are still in the process of preparation. At the beginning of this year, the Commission adopted an EU-level improvement plan (EED 27/03/07) to implement POPs regulations. It emphasizes the need to properly enforce existing laws to suppress substances such as dioxin, furans and polychlorinated biphenyls, such as the well-established Pollution Prevention and Control Act (IPPC) and the Waste Structures Directive. POPs are also considered the best technical reference documents for review under the IPPC directive, and two new POPs obsolete specifications (EED 27/02/07 and EED 12/07/06) were also adopted last year. The progress report also celebrates a new industrial emissions data register with lower reporting thresholds for substances such as dioxin, furans and polychlorinated biphenyls (EED 06/02/06). But it also mentioned that in Europe

Norway has submitted PoHS (Prohibition on Certain Hazardous Substances in consumer Products) control requirements to the WTO

In June 2007, the Norwegian Pollution Control Authority proposed to the World Trade Organization (WTO) that during the production, import, export, and sale of consumer products, the content of harmful substances in each uniform material must not exceed the legal limit. The main purpose of this law is to limit the harm of consumer products to the human body and the environment, as well as the content of harmful substances in waste. Norway's PoHS has more and broader items restricting hazardous substances than the EU RoHS. Almost all consumer products are within its scope of control, with only a few excluded, such as: food, food packaging, fertilizers, medical equipment and cigarettes, as well as transportation Tools, transport fixtures, tires and similar transport accessories. The 18 hazardous substances and limits controlled by PoHS are as follows: Substance name limit (wt%) Substance name limit (wt%) Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) 0.1 Musk xyleneMusk ketone 0.05 Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) 1 Perfluorooctyl acid (PFOA) and individuals alts and esters of PFOA 0.005 * Medium-chainedChlorinated paraffins,C14-C17 (MCCP) 0.1 DTDMA

Chemical label revision bill submitted for review

On June 27, 2007, the European Commission adopted a bill on regulations on the classification, labeling and packaging of substances and mixtures, aiming to align the EU system with the United Nations Global Harmonized System. If the bill is passed, the current individual labeling requirements for products imported into the EU will be lifted, which should benefit Hong Kong and mainland Chinese manufacturers. In addition, the Ordinance Bill is also complementary to the new Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals Regulations ("REACH"). The current EU chemical classification and labeling system is set out in the following three important directives, which provide a high degree of protection in terms of health, safety, environment and consumers: • Hazardous Substances Directive (67/548/EEC); • Hazardous Preparations Directive ( 1999/45/EC); • Safety Data Sheet Directive (91/155/EEC – from 1 June 2007, this directive has been replaced by the REACH regulation). The first two directives above set out the requirements for classification, packaging and labeling of hazardous substances and preparations, while the third directive ensures that suppliers of substances and preparations provide professional customers with information on the hazards and safe use of chemicals. The goals of the regulations include: 1) unifying the classification, labeling and packaging rules for substances and mixtures; 2) requiring companies to classify the substances and mixtures they manufacture on their own and notify relevant authorities; 3) developing a unified list of substances; 4) A label catalog is provided. The following is an example of labeling changes for extremely flammable chemicals: For most chemicals, the proposed regime would be similar to the current regime

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) sales and use restrictions

Regulation: 2006/122/EC Focus: Strict restrictions are placed on the market and use of PFOS and related substances, but small amounts are allowed to be used when they do not create unacceptable risks. Limit values: • 0.005% (50ppm) in preparations; • 0.1% (1000ppm) in semi-finished products; • 1μg/m2 in textiles or coatings. Exclusions: • Photoresists or anti-reflective coatings for photolithography processes • Industrial photography coatings (photographic coatings applied to films, papers, or printing plates) • Mist suppressants for non-decorative hard chromium (VI) plating and wetting agents for use in controlled electroplating systems) • Hydraulic fluids for aviation Hazard: prone to accumulation in living fat organs

The UK will implement WEEE from July 1st

The UK finally began to implement the WEEE regulations on July 1, 2007, to reduce the impact of waste electronic products on the environment through reuse and recycling, instead of discarding them in already overcrowded landfills. Technically speaking, end users are now not allowed to throw waste electronic products directly into the trash can; if they do not reuse and recycle Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) properly, they will theoretically have You may face the consequences of being discovered and punished by the Environmental Agency. Once notified of the need for disposal, product suppliers are responsible for the collection and recycling of WEEE. For small companies, the cost of registering directly with the government is very high, and the time spent on paperwork and the effort required are also a lot. Currently, more than 37 companies have been established to help reduce these costs. The WEEE Directive was recognized together with the RoHS Directive in February 2003, with the common goal of reducing the amount of waste in the environment. With the existence of consumer product specifications, there has been confusion about how some commercial goods should be managed. So the trade association (including the UK's Laboratory Technology Industry Trade) led the establishment of a non-profit organization called b2bcompliance. According to David Burton (b2bcompliance's planning director), this organization has been established to protect the interests of their members and provide a complete customer service from registration to processing, and provide certification of legal compliance. Although registered

91/338/EEC Cadmium Directive - Completely Prohibited Certain Equipment

EU Directive 91/338/EEC requires that the cadmium content in finished products or parts in plastic materials, liquid coatings (whether water-based or oil-based), and polymer stabilizers must not exceed 0.01% (100 ppm); cadmium plating is prohibited for certain equipment. The directive also states that if the coating contains a high amount of zinc, the cadmium content must not exceed 0.1% (1000 ppm). Specific equipment where cadmium electroplating is completely prohibited: Machinery and equipment • Food production machinery • Agricultural equipment • Cooling and freezing machines • Printing and book-binding equipment Machinery and equipment used to produce the following products • Household goods • Furniture • Sanitary ware • Central heating and air conditioning plants • Paper and board • Textiles and clothing • Industrial

Global warming should be addressed by providing a protective umbrella for the Earth, promoting nationwide tree planting and afforestation.

Global warming has recently become a widely discussed issue, with some scholars pointing out that Taiwan is warming at twice the global rate. Private enterprises have launched the "Protecting the Earth" campaign, highlighting afforestation as the most effective way to combat global warming. This year, warmer weather and the absence of the plum rain season have led to exceptionally rapid growth of various vegetables, causing prices to plummet. Due to rapid warming and overheated oceans, the Great Barrier Reef is facing a crisis of widespread coral bleaching. Global warming shows no signs of stopping, and scholars predict that the trend of ecological degradation in Taiwan may intensify. As the issue of global warming continues to escalate, the challenges facing Taiwan are unavoidable. The Earth's environment is changing gradually and cannot be ignored. Chen Chao-chen, Dean of the College of Agriculture at National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, stated, "This includes issues related to daily life, production, water resources, agriculture, and even health, all of which will face crises." Statistics show that the Earth's carbon dioxide concentration and temperature have risen sharply over the past 100 years, evidence of global warming. Experts recommend that afforestation is the lowest-cost and simplest way to mitigate the greenhouse effect. Chen Chao-chen stated, "By planting trees on the earth, we are essentially capturing carbon dioxide from the air and storing it in the tree trunk. In this way, the tree becomes like a green factory." The government and private enterprises are actively promoting forest restoration and a nationwide afforestation campaign, taking the first step to protect the planet—starting now. (Reprinted from Yahoo News)

British report: Humanity will pay a heavy price for the consequences of global warming.

If governments continue to ignore the impacts of global warming over the next decade, humanity will pay a devastating price. A research report to be released on the 30th by former World Bank chief economist Stern indicates this cost could reach $6.98 trillion. Stern's over 700-page report marks the first analysis of global warming by a leading economist. The British weekly magazine *The Observer* published excerpts, suggesting that frequent floods and droughts could displace over 200 million people. Global economic growth will also be severely hampered. The magazine also quoted British authorities as saying, "Just as global warming sparked a frenzy in the scientific community two years ago, this issue will also generate widespread discussion in the economics community." The report states that the price humanity pays for global warming will exceed that of World War I and II or the Great Depression of the 1930s. Even if governments immediately stop polluting the planet, accumulated carbon dioxide emissions will continue the warming effect for another 30 years, and sea levels will continue to rise for the next century. With global warming becoming an urgent issue, Stern suggested that countries should sign a new agreement following the Kyoto Protocol next year, instead of waiting until 2010 as originally planned. Stern urged the world to establish international standards not only to halt the rapid rise in temperatures but also to reduce the carbon footprint of the atmosphere. He stressed that decisive action from the international community is essential to solving the problem. (Reprinted from Yahoo! News)

Promoting waste recycling creates a huge business opportunity for global warming.

Global warming also presents business opportunities. Besides LEDs, solar energy, and other alternative energy sources, efficient waste recycling offers immense potential. Take paper, for example: Taiwanese people consume over 300,000 tons of paper daily just from reading newspapers, and globally, approximately four billion trees die annually from paper production, severely impacting the environment. If we properly utilize waste paper through recycling, it will not only be environmentally friendly but also present significant business opportunities. Some domestic companies have already obtained green certifications by promoting waste recycling, securing orders from major domestic and international manufacturers and successfully entering the global market. It's energy efficient, water-saving, and easy to do. Beyond waste paper, there's also the recycling of waste building materials, with the green building materials trend creating a surge in business opportunities. Fiberglass, recycled pulp, and building material scraps are all recycled. Even water vapor generated during the manufacturing process is carefully recovered. Although recycling and reuse are more expensive, the commitment to environmental protection results in healthier and more efficient products. The green trend brings numerous business opportunities both domestically and internationally. However, becoming a green member inevitably comes at a price, but for manufacturers who invest early, it's definitely a case of short-term losses followed by long-term gains. (Reposted from Yahoo News)

Global warming has reduced the Antarctic Ocean's CO2 absorption capacity by 38%, leading to atmospheric imbalance.

Oceans cover 70% of the Earth's surface and are the best solvent for regulating atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. However, due to severe global warming, the oceans are gradually losing their regulatory function. British scientists recently discovered that even the Antarctic Ocean's ability to naturally metabolize carbon dioxide has greatly decreased, and a global crisis is looming. Phytoplankton in the Antarctic Ocean can absorb carbon dioxide during photosynthesis, while simultaneously releasing excess dissolved oxygen into the air. However, scientists have found that the Antarctic Ocean's ability to absorb atmospheric carbon dioxide has decreased by 38% over the past 25 years, while global atmospheric carbon dioxide levels have increased by 43%. Comparing these two figures, not only has carbon dioxide not decreased, but the Antarctic Ocean is actually increasing its carbon dioxide levels by 200 million tons annually. This is because the rising concentration of carbon dioxide in the ozone layer alters atmospheric pressure, causing increased wind speeds and bringing carbon dioxide-laden deep-sea water to the surface. British scientist Mark Moslin said, "It's a complete system. Marine organisms that can perform photosynthesis and release substances (oxygen) descend to the seabed, but at the same time, wind speeds change, causing carbon dioxide to be released from the sea surface into the air." Climate warming indirectly affects changes in atmospheric circulation, weakening the ocean's ability to regulate atmospheric carbon dioxide. Scientists warn that the current concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is out of control, causing an imbalance in the marine ecosystem. Therefore, reducing carbon dioxide emissions has become an urgent task for all mankind.

error: Content protected